Why the study?
Does intravascular ultrasound accurately measure lumen geometry and distensibility compared to quantitative angiography in human arteries?
Does intravascular ultrasound accurately measure lumen geometry and distensibility compared to quantitative angiography in human arteries?
Intravascular ultrasound is an accurate and reproducible technique to measure vascular diameter, lumen area, and arterial wall distensibility in vivo.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports IVUS for lumen assessment in small cohorts; leaves open larger prospective validation before clinical adoption.
The feasibility of assessing lumen diameter and area using a 30-MHz mechanically driven ultrasound imaging device was evaluated in vitro in phantoms and in vivo in eight human arteries (six iliac, two brachial). Ultrasound data were compared to angiographic data derived from the cardiovascular angiographic analysis system. In addition, the change of lumen area in a given cardiac cycle was determined in each patient. A close relation between ultrasound and angiography was observed in the phantom studies. In the first three patients there was disagreement; ultrasound images showed larger values compared to the angiographically derived values. Disagreement was related to the use of nominal measurements of the sheath supplied by the manufacturer as calibration. Data on the five other patients showed a close relation between the values derived with ultrasound and angiography. The arterial lumen area revealed a 5% +/- 2% change during one cardiac cycle. The intra- and interobserver variability test showed good correlation for the ultrasound study. This study demonstrates that intravascular ultrasound is an accurate and reproducible technique to measure vascular diameter, lumen area, and arterial wall distensibility in vivo.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
The et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: