Why the study?
Complication risks and rhythm outcomes differ by sex after AF catheter ablation, prompting evaluation of sex differences in mapping and rhythm outcomes during repeat ablation procedures.
Do mapping and rhythm outcomes differ between women and men undergoing a repeat atrial fibrillation catheter ablation?
Do mapping and rhythm outcomes differ between women and men undergoing a repeat atrial fibrillation catheter ablation?
In patients undergoing repeat atrial fibrillation ablation, women have fewer pulmonary vein reconnections but more extra-PV triggers and elevated LA pressure, leading to a higher risk of clinical recurrence compared to men.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Women show distinct mapping and higher recurrence after repeat AFCA; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before influencing strategies.
OBJECTIVE: The risk of procedure-related complications and rhythm outcomes differ between men and women after atrial fibrillation catheter ablation (AFCA). We evaluated whether consistent sex differences existed in mapping and rhythm outcomes in repeat ablation procedures. METHODS: Among 3282 patients in the registry, we analysed 443 consecutive patients (24.6% female, 58.5±10.3 years old, 61.5% with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation) who underwent a second AFCA. We compared the clinical factors, mapping, left atrial (LA) pressure, complications and long-term clinical recurrences after propensity score matching. Pulmonary vein (PV) reconnections were lower (58.7% vs 74.9%, p=0.001), but the proportion of extra-PV triggers (27.5% vs 17.0%, p=0.026) and elevated LA pulse pressures (79.7% vs 63.7%, p=0.019) was significantly higher in women than in men. There was no significant sex difference in the rate of procedure-related complications (4.6% vs 4.2%, p=0.791). During a 31-month (8-60) median follow-up, clinical recurrences were significantly higher in women after both the de novo procedure (log-rank p=0.039, antiarrhythmic drug (AAD)-free log-rank p<0.001) and the second procedure (log-rank p=0.006, AAD-free log-rank p=0.093). Female sex (HR 1.51, 95% CI 1.06 to 2.15, p=0.023), non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (HR 1.78, 95% CI 1.30 to 2.34, p<0.010) and extra-PV triggers (HR 1.88, 95% CI 1.28 to 2.75, p=0.001) were independently associated with clinical recurrences after repeat procedures. CONCLUSIONS: During repeat AFCA procedures, PV reconnections were lower in women than in men, and the existence of extra-PV triggers and an LA pressure elevation were more significant, which resulted in poor rhythm outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02138695.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pak et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: