Why the study?
Are serum levels of anti-β1AR and anti-B13 antibodies associated with severe presentation of chronic Chagas heart disease?
Are serum levels of anti-β1AR and anti-B13 antibodies associated with severe presentation of chronic Chagas heart disease?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Elevated levels of anti-β1AR and anti-B13 antibodies are associated with severe chronic Chagas heart disease and may serve as biomarkers for systolic heart failure in this population.
OBJECTIVE: Autoantibodies cross-reacting with the β1 adrenergic receptor (anti-β1AR and anti-p2β) and cardiac myosin antigens (anti-B13) have been related to the pathogenesis of chronic Chagas heart disease (CCHD). Studies exploring their levels in different stages are scarce. We aimed to evaluate the relationship of these autoantibodies with the clinical profile of chronic patients, especially regarding their classificatory accuracy in severe presentation with heart failure. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of 155 T. cruzi-seropositive patients and 26 age- and gender-matched healthy controls. They were categorised in three stages of CCHD. Serum antibodies were measured by specific immunoassays. Symptomatic individuals showed increased levels of anti-β1AR and anti-B13, while anti-p2β antibodies were similar between groups. A composite logistic regression model including anti-B13, anti-β1AR antibody levels and age was able to predict systolic heart failure yielding an area under the curve of 83% (sensitivity of 67% and specificity of 89%). CONCLUSIONS: In our study, anti-β1AR and anti-B13 antibodies were higher in individuals with chronic Chagas heart disease stage III, mainly in those with dilated cardiomyopathy associated with systolic heart failure. Logistic regression analysis showed that both antibodies were good predictors of severe CCHD. As well as being involved in disease progression, anti-β1AR and anti-B13 antibodies may be used as a serum marker of poor prognosis in terms of heart compromise.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rodeles et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: