Key result
QRS narrowing (OR 1.03) and left ventricular pacing threshold (OR 0.42) independently predicted CRT response, with a 91% response rate when both optimal cutoffs were met versus 25% when neither were.
Why the study?
Patients with advanced heart failure and dyssynchrony benefit from CRT, and myocardial viability along with improved dyssynchrony are suggested to be important for predicting CRT response.
Do QRS narrowing and left ventricular pacing threshold predict echocardiographic response to CRT in patients with advanced heart failure?
Cohort (n=93)
No
Do QRS narrowing and left ventricular pacing threshold predict echocardiographic response to CRT in patients with advanced heart failure?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Both myocardial viability (assessed by LVPT) and improved electrical dyssynchrony (assessed by QRS narrowing) are independent predictors of echocardiographic response to CRT.
INTRODUCTION: Patients with advanced heart failure and dyssynchrony can benefit from cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). To predict the response to CRT, myocardial viability and improved dyssynchrony are suggested to be important. METHODS: We retrospectively investigated 93 patients who underwent CRT implantation in Nagoya University Hospital. We assessed QRS narrowing the day after implantation to measure the improvement in dyssynchrony and measured the left ventricular pacing threshold (LVPT) to determine the local myocardial viability in all patients. Responders to CRT were defined as those having a greater than or equal to 15% decrease in left ventricular end-systolic volume by echocardiography at their 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients (67%) were classified as responders. The QRS width before CRT implantation, QRS narrowing after implantation, left atrial diameter, septal-to-posterior wall motion delay, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, radial strain, and LVPT were significantly different between the responder and nonresponder groups. On multivariate analysis, QRS narrowing (odds ratio [OR], 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.05; P = 0.005) and LVPT (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.22-0.82; P = 0.011) were independent predictors of a response to CRT. We calculated the cutoff values from the receiver operating characteristic curves as 22.5 milliseconds of QRS narrowing and 1.55 V of LVPT. The response rates in patients with both predictive factors (QRS narrowing ≥ 22.5 milliseconds and LVPT ≤ 1.55 V), one factor, and no factors were 91%, 61%, and 25%, respectively (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Both myocardial viability and improved electrical dyssynchrony may be essential to predict a good response to CRT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Takenaka et al. (2018) conducted a cohort in Advanced heart failure and dyssynchrony (n=93). QRS narrowing and left ventricular pacing threshold vs. Absence of these predictive factors was evaluated on Response to CRT (≥15% decrease in left ventricular end-systolic volume by echocardiography at 6 months) (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.05, p=0.005). QRS narrowing (OR 1.03) and left ventricular pacing threshold (OR 0.42) independently predicted CRT response, with a 91% response rate when both optimal cutoffs were met versus 25% when neither were.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: