Key result
Continuous rapid pacing from the left atrial appendage resulted in significantly greater ERP dispersion and higher atrial fibrillation inducibility compared to right atrial appendage pacing (p<0.05).
Why the study?
Does rapid pacing from the left atrial appendage compared to the right atrial appendage increase arrhythmogenicity in a canine model of atrial fibrillation?
Does rapid pacing from the left atrial appendage compared to the right atrial appendage increase arrhythmogenicity in a canine model of atrial fibrillation?
p-value: p=<0.05
Left atrial appendage stimulation is more arrhythmogenic than right atrial appendage stimulation in a canine model, potentially explaining the clinical importance of pulmonary vein premature contractions in AF.
Suggests site-specific atrial vulnerability in canines; leaves open relevance to human pulmonary vein triggers in AF.
BACKGROUND: Continuous rapid atrial stimulation causes atrial remodeling, but little is known about the difference in the arrhythmogenicity of the left (LA) and right atria (RA). METHODS AND RESULTS: In 14 beagle dogs, continuous rapid pacing (400 beats/min) was delivered from the right (n=7) or left (n=7) atrial appendage (RAA or LAA) for 2 weeks. The atrial effective refractory period (ERP), ERP dispersion, and inducibility of atrial fibrillation (AF) were evaluated along the time course from 4 atrial sites: (1) RAA, (2) area close to the inferior vena cava (IVC), (3) Bachmann's bundle (BB) and (4) LA. The ERP exhibited progressive shortening at all sites, but the degree of shortening differed among them. In the RA stimulation group, ERP shortening was more prominent in the RAA and LA than in the IVC or BB. In contrast, in the LA stimulation group, ERP shortening was more prominent in the LA than in the other sites. As a result, ERP dispersion was larger in the LA stimulation group than in the RA stimulation group and the AF inducibility was higher in the LA stimulation group than in the RA stimulation group, especially at the LA site (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: LAA stimulation was more arrhythmogenic than RAA stimulation in this model. This result may partly explain the importance of premature contractions occurring from the pulmonary veins in clinical cases of AF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Niwano et al. (2007) studied Atrial Fibrillation (Canine Model) (n=14). Left atrial appendage (LAA) rapid pacing vs. Right atrial appendage (RAA) rapid pacing was evaluated on Atrial effective refractory period (ERP) dispersion and atrial fibrillation (AF) inducibility (p=<0.05). Continuous rapid pacing from the left atrial appendage resulted in significantly greater ERP dispersion and higher atrial fibrillation inducibility compared to right atrial appendage pacing (p<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: