Key result
In pacemaker patients, the optimum upper rate limit was 86% of age-predicted maximum heart rate for those with normal LVEF versus 75% for those with left ventricular dysfunction.
Why the study?
Can cardiopulmonary exercise testing and exercise Doppler echocardiography define the optimal maximum heart rate in pacemaker patients with chronotropic incompetence?
Observational (n=49)
Can cardiopulmonary exercise testing and exercise Doppler echocardiography define the optimal maximum heart rate in pacemaker patients with chronotropic incompetence?
Cardiopulmonary exercise testing and exercise Doppler echocardiography can effectively determine the optimum upper heart rate limit in pacemaker patients, demonstrating that patients with left ventricular dysfunction have a lower optimal maximum heart rate.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support LVEF-tailored upper rate programming in pacemakers; leaves open need for prospective validation.
AIMS: There is no non-invasive method to determine the individual optimum of maximum exercise heart rate. Knowledge of this value is of particular interest in patients with structural heart disease who are prone to tachycardia intolerance. The purpose of this study was to define the optimal maximum heart rate using cardiopulmonary exercise testing and exercise Doppler echocardiography and to compare the results of both approaches. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 49 pacemaker patients with chronotropic incompetence, the optimum upper heart rate limit was determined using cardiopulmonary exercise testing and exercise Doppler echocardiography. The optimum upper rate limit was given by the highest pacing rate which still produced an increase in oxygen consumption, or by that pacing rate which was linked to the lowest value for the Doppler-derived myocardial performance index. In patients with normal left ventricular ejection fraction (>or=55%) the optimum upper rate limit was 86% of age-predicted maximum heart rate, in patients with left ventriuclar dysfunction (ejection fraction <or=45%) it was 75% of the age-predicted maximum rate (P=0.004). The optimum upper rate limit, as defined by cardiopulmonary exercise testing and exercise Doppler echocardiography, were closely correlated (P<0.0001) with a mean deviation of 6+/-6 beats x min(-1). CONCLUSION: Cardiopulmonary exercise testing and exercise Doppler echocardiography are valuable tools which help to determine the optimum upper rate limit in order to avoid excess heart rates in heart failure patients. The application of these methods is not limited to pacemaker patients but may be helpful in therapeutic interventions with chronotropic drugs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Michael Kindermann (2002) conducted an observational in pacemaker patients with chronotropic incompetence (n=49). Normal left ventricular ejection fraction (≥55%) vs. Left ventricular dysfunction (≤45%) was evaluated on Optimum upper rate limit (% of age-predicted maximum heart rate) (p=0.004). In pacemaker patients, the optimum upper rate limit was 86% of age-predicted maximum heart rate for those with normal LVEF versus 75% for those with left ventricular dysfunction.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: