Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
February 11, 2025Annals of HepatologyOpen Access

Diastolic dysfunction: Prevalence and outcome in liver transplantation candidates

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Key result

Diastolic dysfunction, present in 6.4% of liver transplantation candidates according to revised 2019 criteria, did not significantly impact post-transplant survival (91.7% vs 85.6%, p=0.391).

Why the study?

Diagnostic criteria for cirrhotic cardiomyopathy presenting primarily as diastolic dysfunction were updated in 2019, prompting evaluation of the prevalence and clinical impact of diastolic dysfunction in liver transplantation candidates.

Does diastolic dysfunction impact mortality in adult cirrhotic liver transplantation candidates?

Population

233 adult cirrhotic liver transplantation candidates

Comparison

Diastolic dysfunction by original 2005 vs revised 2019 criteria, and presence vs absence of diastolic dysfunction

Design

Retrospective study

Authors

FVFrancis VoetMKMaxim KhalenkowMPMichel De Pauw

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Revised 2019 criteria identify DD in 6% of LT candidates vs 72% by 2005 without outcome differences; leaves open prospective validation of clinical utility.

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=233)

Multicenter

No

Structured PICO

Does diastolic dysfunction impact mortality in adult cirrhotic liver transplantation candidates?

P
Population
233 adult cirrhotic liver transplantation candidates, 32.2% female with a median age of 61 years, followed for a median of 1290 days to assess the prevalence and impact of diastolic dysfunction.
E
Exposure
Presence of diastolic dysfunction (DD) diagnosed by the revised 2019 criteria
C
Comparator
Absence of diastolic dysfunction
O
Outcome
Waitlist mortality and post-transplant survivalhard clinical

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 91.7% vs 85.6%

p-value: p=0.391

Diastolic dysfunction, defined by the revised 2019 criteria, is present in 6.4% of liver transplant candidates and does not significantly impact overall post-transplant mortality, though lower pre-transplant e' lateral velocity is associated with worse outcomes.

Limitations

  • Single-center, retrospective design
  • Small number of patients diagnosed with diastolic dysfunction according to the revised criteria
  • Limited follow-up echocardiogram data post-transplantation to assess reversibility
  • single-center
  • retrospective design
  • limited number of patients

Cite This Study

Voet et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Cirrhosis (Liver transplantation candidates) (n=233). Diastolic dysfunction (2019 revised criteria) vs. No diastolic dysfunction was evaluated on Post-transplant survival (p=0.391). Diastolic dysfunction, present in 6.4% of liver transplantation candidates according to revised 2019 criteria, did not significantly impact post-transplant survival (91.7% vs 85.6%, p=0.391).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a93b14feea32b7d89ebb689https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aohep.2025.101784
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Impact and persistence of cirrhotic cardiomyopathy after liver transplantation2016 · 57 citations
  2. 2Cirrhotic Cardiomyopathy Predicts Posttransplant Cardiovascular Disease: Revelations of the New Diagnostic Criteria2021 · 79 citations
  3. 3Cirrhotic cardiomyopathy: Appraisal of the original and revised criteria in predicting posttransplant cardiac outcomes2022 · 51 citations
  4. 4Prevalence and prognostic value of cirrhotic cardiomyopathy as defined according to the proposed new classification2021 · 38 citations
  5. 5The prevalence of cirrhotic cardiomyopathy according to different diagnostic criteria2020 · 69 citations