Key result
The ACE gene D allele polymorphism was a significant risk factor for developing microalbuminuria in type 2 diabetic patients over 9 years, with 12 of 50 total patients developing the condition.
Why the study?
Is the ACE gene D allele polymorphism a risk factor for developing microalbuminuria in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus?
Observational (n=50)
Is the ACE gene D allele polymorphism a risk factor for developing microalbuminuria in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus?
The ACE gene D allele polymorphism is a potent risk factor for the development of microalbuminuria in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes.
To clarify the risk factors for developing microalbuminuria in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, a longitudinal observational study was performed. Fifty patients with normoalbuminuria were recruited and treated conventionally for 9 years. Polymorphisms of the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) gene and the angiotensinogen M235T polymorphism were examined. During the study period, 12 of the 50 patients developed microalbuminuria; no patients progressed to macroalbuminuria. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed using age, duration of diabetes, body mass index, haemoglobin A1c' blood pressure, serum lipid profile and genetic polymorphisms as independent variables and development of microalbuminuria as the dependent variable. The D allele of the ACE gene was an independent and significant variable. We conclude that the ACE gene D allele polymorphism is a potent risk factor for developing microalbuminuria in type 2 diabetic patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Okuno et al. (2003) conducted an observational in Type 2 diabetes mellitus (n=50). ACE gene D allele polymorphism was evaluated on Development of microalbuminuria. The ACE gene D allele polymorphism was a significant risk factor for developing microalbuminuria in type 2 diabetic patients over 9 years, with 12 of 50 total patients developing the condition.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: