Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
January 1, 2017Advances in Interventional CardiologyOpen Access

Sex-related differences in clinical outcomes and quality of life after transcatheter aortic valve implantation for severe aortic stenosis

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Key result

In high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI, there was no significant difference in 12-month all-cause mortality between women and men (13.1% vs. 25.0%; age-adjusted OR 2.51; p=0.13).

Why the study?

Does gender affect clinical outcomes and quality of life in high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI?

Population

101 consecutive patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis and high surgical risk or contraindications…

Comparison

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in… vs Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in male…

Design

Cohort

Follow-up

12 months

Authors

MBMaciej BagieńskiTTTomasz TokarekAWAgata Wiktorowicz

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

No sex difference in post-TAVI mortality supports equitable access; leaves open need for larger prospective studies on subgroups and QoL.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=101)

Multicenter

No

Structured PICO

Does gender affect clinical outcomes and quality of life in high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI?

P
Population
101 consecutive high-risk patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation, followed for 12 months.
E
Exposure
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in female patients
C
Comparator
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in male patients
O
Outcome
All-cause mortality at 30 days and 12 monthshard clinical

Main Result

Odds Ratio: 2.51 (95% CI 0.87–7.25)

Absolute Event Rate: 13.1% vs 25%

p-value: p=0.13

TAVI is an effective and safe treatment in high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis, with similar 30-day and 12-month mortality and quality of life improvements regardless of gender.

Limitations

  • Non-randomized design
  • Potential bias regarding treatment selection
  • Relatively small sample size
  • Single-center experience
  • Potential bias regarding treatment selection by heart team
  • Single-centre experience

Cite This Study

Bagieński et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Severe aortic stenosis (n=101). Female sex vs. Male sex was evaluated on 12-month all-cause mortality (OR 2.51, 95% CI 0.87-7.25, p=0.13). In high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI, there was no significant difference in 12-month all-cause mortality between women and men (13.1% vs. 25.0%; age-adjusted OR 2.51; p=0.13).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a9590157007bd2ef4e3cc88https://doi.org/10.5114/aic.2017.70195
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Gender‐related differences on short‐ and long‐term outcomes of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation2016 · 44 citations
  2. 2Sex-related differences after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: A retrospective propensity-matched cohort2026
  3. 3Influence of Sex on Outcome Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI): Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis2014 · 58 citations
  4. 4The influence of gender on outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve implantation2024 · 6 citations
  5. 5Sex-based differences in outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials2026 · 1 citations