Key result
The diastolic index Ed/Ea was an independent prognostic factor for all-cause mortality during the first year after discharge (p=0.045), but its significance did not persist at 1 to 3 years.
Why the study?
The prognostic value of clinical factors may change over time, especially in elderly patients, and the significance of the afterload-integrated diastolic index Ed/Ea across different follow-up periods in HFpEF remained unclear.
Does the diastolic index (Ed/Ea) predict all-cause mortality in elderly patients hospitalized for acute decompensated HFpEF?
Cohort (n=552)
Does the diastolic index (Ed/Ea) predict all-cause mortality in elderly patients hospitalized for acute decompensated HFpEF?
The echocardiographic diastolic index (Ed/Ea) is a valid short-term (first year) prognostic marker for mortality in elderly HFpEF patients, whereas serum albumin remains prognostic over a longer term.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Ed/Ea may support short-term risk stratification post-discharge in elderly HFpEF; leaves open longer-term utility and prospective validation.
OBJECTIVE: During follow-up time, the value of prognostic factors may change, especially in the elderly patients, and the altered extent may affect the prognosis. We aimed to clarify the significance of the ratio of diastolic elastance (Ed) to arterial elastance (Ea), (Ed/Ea=(E/e')/(0.9×systolic blood pressure)), an afterload-integrated diastolic index, in relation to follow-up periods and other laboratory factors, on the prognosis of elderly patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). METHODS: We studied 552 HFpEF patients hospitalised for acute decompensated heart failure (men/women: 255/297). Blood testing and transthoracic echocardiography were performed before discharge. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 508 days, 88 patients (men/women: 39/49) had all-cause mortality. During the first year after discharge, Ed/Ea (p=0.045) was an independent prognostic factor in association with albumin (p<0.001) and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP, p=0.005) levels after adjusting for age and sex in the multivariate Cox hazard analysis. However, at 1 to 3 years after discharge, no other significant prognostic factors, except for albumin level (p=0.046), were detected. In the subgroup analysis, albumin, but not NT-proBNP level, showed a significant interaction with Ed/Ea for prognosis (p=0.047). CONCLUSION: The prognostic significance of a haemodynamic parameter such as Ed/Ea may be valid only during a short-term period, but that of albumin was persisting during the entire follow-up period in the elderly patients. The clinical significance of prognostic factors in HFpEF patients may differ according to the follow-up period.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hoshida et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) (n=552). Ratio of diastolic elastance to arterial elastance (Ed/Ea) was evaluated on All-cause mortality (p=0.045). The diastolic index Ed/Ea was an independent prognostic factor for all-cause mortality during the first year after discharge (p=0.045), but its significance did not persist at 1 to 3 years.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: