Key result
Enzyme immunoassay (EMIT) and reverse-phase high performance liquid chromatography were compared for quantifying serum quinidine levels in the treatment of cardiac arrhythmia.
Why the study?
How does the enzyme immunoassay technique compare with high performance liquid chromatography for the quantitation of quinidine in serum?
Population
Serum or plasma samples for quantitation of quinidine
Comparison
Enzyme immunoassay technique (EMIT) vs Reverse-phase high performance liquid…
Design
Other
Authors
Loading...
Quinidine monitoring by EMIT or HPLC warrants caution in arrhythmia patients; leaves open which assay is reliable.
How does the enzyme immunoassay technique compare with high performance liquid chromatography for the quantitation of quinidine in serum?
This study compares two laboratory methods for monitoring serum quinidine levels, which is important for managing patients with cardiac arrhythmias.
Dextraze et al. (1981) studied this question. Enzyme immunoassay (EMIT) and reverse-phase high performance liquid chromatography were compared for quantifying serum quinidine levels in the treatment of cardiac arrhythmia.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: