Key result
Measuring APC resistance without dilution in factor V-deficient plasma identified 24 APC-resistant subjects, detecting potentially important thrombotic risk factors other than factor V Leiden.
Why the study?
Does measuring APC resistance without dilution in factor V-deficient plasma detect thrombotic risk factors other than Factor V Leiden?
Population
65 subjects in a blinded case-control study assessing venous thromboembolism risk factors
Comparison
Activated protein C resistance measurement… vs APC resistance measurement with dilution in…
Design
Case-control, blinded
Authors
Loading...
May identify non-FVL thrombotic risks; hypothesis-generating and requires validation before clinical adoption.
Case-Control (n=65)
Blinded
Does measuring APC resistance without dilution in factor V-deficient plasma detect thrombotic risk factors other than Factor V Leiden?
Measuring APC resistance without dilution in factor V-deficient plasma can identify potentially important thrombotic risk factors beyond Factor V Leiden.
Qamar et al. (2003) conducted a case-control in Venous thromboembolism (VTE) and Activated protein C (APC) resistance (n=65). Activated protein C (APC) resistance assay without dilution in factor V-deficient plasma vs. Assays with dilution in factor V-deficient plasma or Russell viper venom-based assay was evaluated on Detection of APC resistance. Measuring APC resistance without dilution in factor V-deficient plasma identified 24 APC-resistant subjects, detecting potentially important thrombotic risk factors other than factor V Leiden.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: