Key result
The combination of a cardiac lipid panel with NT-proBNP distinguished HFrEF patients from healthy controls significantly better than NT-proBNP alone (AUC 0.97 vs 0.93; P<0.001).
Why the study?
Does a novel cardiac lipid panel combined with NT-proBNP improve the diagnostic accuracy for HFrEF compared to NT-proBNP alone?
Observational (n=887)
Yes
Does a novel cardiac lipid panel combined with NT-proBNP improve the diagnostic accuracy for HFrEF compared to NT-proBNP alone?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.97% vs 0.93%
p-value: p=<0.001
A novel cardiac lipid panel combined with NT-proBNP significantly improves the diagnostic accuracy for HFrEF compared to NT-proBNP alone, including in mild and asymptomatic stages.
May improve HFrEF detection beyond NT-proBNP; leaves open prospective validation before clinical use.
OBJECTIVES: In this study we aimed to identify novel metabolomic biomarkers suitable for improved diagnosis of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). METHODS: We prospectively recruited 887 individuals consisting of HFrEF patients with either ischemic (ICMP, n = 257) or nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICMP, n = 269), healthy controls (n = 327), and patients with pulmonary diseases (n = 34). A single-center identification (n = 238) was followed by a multicenter confirmation study (n = 649). Plasma samples from the single-center study were subjected to metabolite profiling analysis to identify metabolomic features with potential as HFrEF biomarkers. A dedicated analytical protocol was developed for the routine analysis of selected metabolic features in the multicenter cohort. RESULTS: In the single-center study, 92 of 181 metabolomic features with known chemical identity (51%) were significantly changed in HFrEF patients compared to healthy controls (P <0.05). Three specific metabolomic features belonging to the lipid classes of sphingomyelins, triglycerides, and phosphatidylcholines were selected as the cardiac lipid panel (CLP) and analyzed in the multicenter study using the dedicated analytical protocol. The combination of the CLP with N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) distinguished HFrEF patients from healthy controls with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.97 (sensitivity 80.2%, specificity 97.6%) and was significantly superior compared to NT-proBNP alone (AUC = 0.93, sensitivity 81.7%, specificity 88.1%, P <0.001), even in the subgroups with mildly reduced left ventricular EF (0.94 vs 0.87; P <0.001) and asymptomatic patients (0.95 vs 0.91; P <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The new metabolomic biomarker panel has the potential to improve HFrEF detection, even in mild and asymptomatic stages. The observed changes further indicate lipid alterations in the setting of HFrEF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mueller‐Hennessen et al. (2016) conducted an observational in Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) (n=887). Cardiac lipid panel (CLP) combined with NT-proBNP vs. NT-proBNP alone was evaluated on Distinguishing HFrEF patients from healthy controls (AUC) (p=<0.001). The combination of a cardiac lipid panel with NT-proBNP distinguished HFrEF patients from healthy controls significantly better than NT-proBNP alone (AUC 0.97 vs 0.93; P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: