Key result
A history of Kawasaki Disease was not associated with significant differences in carotid intima-media roughness compared to healthy controls.
Why the study?
Standard vascular parameters like cIMT have not been established as reliable markers of vascular anomalies after KD, prompting investigation into whether KD or its key clinical aspects are associated with long-term cIMR alterations.
Does a history of Kawasaki Disease increase carotid intima-media roughness in children compared to healthy controls?
Case-Control (n=80)
Does a history of Kawasaki Disease increase carotid intima-media roughness in children compared to healthy controls?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A history of Kawasaki Disease does not appear to be associated with increased carotid intima-media roughness, suggesting no significant predisposition to subsequent general arteriopathy, though limited by small sample size.
Background: Kawasaki Disease (KD) is a generalized vasculitis in childhood with possible long-term impact on cardiovascular health besides the presence of coronary artery lesions. Standard vascular parameters such as carotid intima–media thickness (cIMT) have not been established as reliable markers of vascular anomalies after KD. The carotid intima–media roughness (cIMR) representing carotid intimal surface structure is considered a promising surrogate marker for predicting cardiovascular risk even beyond cIMT. We therefore measured cIMR in patients with a history of KD in comparison to healthy controls to investigate whether KD itself and/or KD key clinical aspects are associated with cIMR alterations in the long-term. Methods: We assessed cIMR in this case-control study (44 KD, mean age in years (SD); 13.4 (7.5); 36 controls, mean age 12.1 (5.3)) approximately matched by sex and age. Different clinical outcomes such as the coronary artery status and acute phase inflammation data were analyzed in association with cIMR values. Results: When comparing all patients with KD to healthy controls, we detected no significant difference in cIMR. None of the clinical parameters indicating the disease severity, such as the persistence of coronary artery aneurysm, were significantly associated with our cIMR values. However, according to our marginally significant findings (p = 0.044), we postulate that the end-diastolic cIMR may be rougher than the end-systolic values in KD patients. Conclusions: We detected no significant differences in cIMR between KD patients and controls that could confirm any evidence that KD predisposes patients to a subsequent general arteriopathy. Our results, however, need to be interpreted in the light of the low number of study participants.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
König et al. (2022) conducted a case-control in Kawasaki Disease (n=80). History of Kawasaki Disease vs. Healthy controls was evaluated on Carotid intima-media roughness (cIMR). A history of Kawasaki Disease was not associated with significant differences in carotid intima-media roughness compared to healthy controls.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: