Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
June 1, 1989Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part H Journal of Engineering in Medicine

Failure and Hydrodynamic Function Testing of Explanted Pericardial and Porcine Bioprosthetic Valves

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Key result

Explanted porcine valves primarily failed due to heavy calcification and adjacent leaflet tears causing 30-70% regurgitation, while pericardial valves mostly failed from tears at the frame edge.

Why the study?

What are the mechanisms of failure and hydrodynamic function of explanted pericardial and porcine bioprosthetic valves?

Population

66 explanted pericardial and porcine bioprosthetic valves

Design

Other

Authors

JFJohn FisherBuffalo State UniversityTST.J. SpytUniversity of LeedsDWD J WheatleyWilfrid Laurier University

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Distinct failure modes may guide material-specific monitoring; leaves open whether design changes can alter explant outcomes.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=66)

Structured PICO

What are the mechanisms of failure and hydrodynamic function of explanted pericardial and porcine bioprosthetic valves?

P
Population
66 explanted pericardial and porcine bioprosthetic valves studied for mechanisms of failure and hydrodynamic function.
E
Exposure
Hydrodynamic function testing and failure mechanism analysis
O
Outcome
Mechanisms of failure and hydrodynamic functionsurrogate

Porcine and pericardial bioprosthetic valves exhibit distinct mechanisms of failure, with porcine valves predominantly failing from calcification-induced tears and pericardial valves from frame-edge tears without calcification.

Cite This Study

Fisher et al. (1989) conducted an observational in Explanted cardiac bioprostheses (n=66). Pericardial and porcine bioprosthetic valves was evaluated on Mechanisms of failure and hydrodynamic function. Explanted porcine valves primarily failed due to heavy calcification and adjacent leaflet tears causing 30-70% regurgitation, while pericardial valves mostly failed from tears at the frame edge.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a97c4681048ae47fb7700dfhttps://doi.org/10.1243/pime_proc_1989_203_012_01
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Laboratory Assessment of the Design, Function, and Durability of Pericardial Bioprostheses1987 · 7 citations
  2. 2An improved pericardial bioprosthetic heart valve Design and laboratory evaluation1987 · 16 citations
  3. 3Performance of the lonescu-Shiley Pericardial Valve in the Aortic Position: 100 Months Clinical Experience1986 · 16 citations