Key result
Mixed venous blood sampling yielded highly correlated values for steady state plasma glucose (r=0.97, p<0.001) and glucose metabolized compared to arterialized venous blood during insulin clamps.
Why the study?
Does the use of mixed venous blood compared to arterialized venous blood provide comparable measurements of insulin action during hyperinsulinemic clamp studies in subjects with varying BMI and glucose tolerance?
Observational (n=16)
Does the use of mixed venous blood compared to arterialized venous blood provide comparable measurements of insulin action during hyperinsulinemic clamp studies in subjects with varying BMI and glucose tolerance?
Effect estimate: r = 0.97
Absolute Event Rate: 111.3% vs 110.6%
p-value: p=<0.001
Mixed venous blood provides highly comparable measurements of insulin action to arterialized venous blood during hyperinsulinemic clamp studies, offering a practical alternative for obese subjects.
May offer simpler alternative to arterialized venous sampling in clamps; leaves open validation across broader populations and conditions.
Mandatory use of arterialized venous blood for glucose measurement during insulin clamp studies can preclude its use in obese subjects. In order to assess the distortion produced by performing clamp studies with mixed venous blood, we have carried out the present study. Sixteen subjects (BMI range 21-53 kg/m2) whose glucose tolerance varied from normal to diabetic, had hyperinsulinemic clamps performed at plasma insulin concentrations approximately 250 microU/ml above basal, using arterialized venous (a.v.) blood for plasma glucose and insulin measurements. The test was repeated on the same subjects, but mixed venous (m.v.) blood was substituted for a.v. blood to determine plasma glucose and insulin concentrations. During the two studies, the mean (+/- SEM) steady state plasma glucose (a.v. = 110.6 +/- 8.8 mg/dl; m.v. = 111.3 +/- 9.8 mg/dl) and the mean incremental increases in insulin concentrations (a.v. = 263 +/- 20 microU/ml; m.v. = 273 +/- 21 microU/ml) were essentially identical. Furthermore, there was almost a perfect correlation between the individual values obtained for both SSPG (r = 0.97, p less than 0.001) and incremental insulin levels (r = 0.98, p less than 0.001) with the two methods. In addition, the amounts of glucose metabolized calculated from the two methods were very similar (a.v. = 4.96 +/- 0.67 mg/kg/min; m.v. = 5.25 +/- 0.76 mg/kg/min) and the two determinations of M were highly correlated (r = 0.97, p less than 0.001). Finally, the relative rank order of the M values obtained for the 16 subjects during the two studies were extremely comparable.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andrews et al. (2008) conducted an observational in Normal to diabetic glucose tolerance (n=16). Mixed venous blood sampling vs. Arterialized venous blood sampling was evaluated on Steady state plasma glucose (SSPG) (r = 0.97, p=<0.001). Mixed venous blood sampling yielded highly correlated values for steady state plasma glucose (r=0.97, p<0.001) and glucose metabolized compared to arterialized venous blood during insulin clamps.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: