Key result
CT measurements of right ventricular cast volumes were significantly more accurate than conventional biplane angiocardiographic methods when compared to actual volumes measured by displacement.
Why the study?
Is CT more accurate than conventional angiocardiographic biplane methods for measuring right ventricular volume in silastic casts?
Is CT more accurate than conventional angiocardiographic biplane methods for measuring right ventricular volume in silastic casts?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
CT provides significantly more accurate measurements of right ventricular volume compared to conventional biplane angiocardiography in an ex vivo cast model.
Angiocardiographic methods available for cardiac chamber volume measurements have been shown to be less accurate although more practical than CT for the evaluation of the LV. To explore the capability of CT for RV volume measurements, silastic casts of seven normal RV were measured by a displacement method, conventional angiocardiographic biplane methods, and CT. The displacement method used degassing beneath vacuum to remove air trapped in the casts, and the actual volumes, which varied between 62 and 188 cc, were measured by Archimedes' principle. Cast volumes measured by biplane angiogram methods displayed a varying degree of spread around the regression line, caused by the chamber's irregular shape and its variation in orientation relative to the x-ray beams. CT measurements were in all aspects significantly more accurate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ringertz et al. (1985) studied Normal right ventricle (n=7). CT vs. Conventional angiocardiographic biplane methods was evaluated on Accuracy of right ventricular volume measurements compared to actual volumes. CT measurements of right ventricular cast volumes were significantly more accurate than conventional biplane angiocardiographic methods when compared to actual volumes measured by displacement.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: