Comparative study shows elevated pulmonary FDG uptake in pulmonary arterial hypertension, indicating limited utility as an independent prognostic marker.
Background: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is characterized by progressive vascular remodeling and right ventricular (RV) dysfunction. ¹⁸F FDG PET/MRI may reveal metabolic altera-tions in the pulmonary parenchyma and vasculature. We investigated pulmonary FDG up-take in PAH versus healthy controls and its associations with hemodynamics, RV function, and clinical outcomes. Methods: Twenty-eight stable PAH patients and 12 age-matched healthy controls underwent ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI. Standardized uptake values (SUV) were measured in lung parenchyma and proxi-mal pulmonary arteries. Hemodynamic parameters were obtained via right heart cath-eterization; RV–PA coupling was assessed as stroke volume/end-systolic volume (SV/ESV). Twen-ty PAH patients underwent follow-up imaging after targeted therapy. Clinical endpoints (CEP: death, hospitalization, disease progression) were analyzed by Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression. Results: PAH patients showed markedly elevated lung parenchymal SUV (0.405 [0.338–0.533] vs. 0.225 [0.207–0.273], p< 0.001) and proximal PA SUV (3.46 [1.95–6.89] vs. 1.48 [1.15–1.65], p< 0.001). The two metrics were uncorrelated (r=+0.105, p=0.595). SUV PA Proximal correlated with mPAP (r=+0.551) and PVR (r=+0.517), while SUV Lung showed no hemodynamic correlations. After 24 months of therapy, RV–PA coupling im-proved significantly (p=0.037); lung SUV showed a non-significant trend toward reduction (Δ=−0.10, p=0.128). Sixteen CEPs occurred; impaired RV–PA coupling (HR=0.04, p=0.002), elevated mPAP (HR=1.08, p< 0.001), and reduced RVEF (HR=0.91, p< 0.001) were strong univaria-ble predictors. Neither SUV metric retained independent prognostic value in multivariable analysis. Conclusions: Pulmonary parenchymal and proximal PA FDG uptake are markedly elevated inPAH. However, neither metric independently predicts hemodynamic severity or clinical outcomes, limiting their current role as reliable prognostic surrogates.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kazimierczyk et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: