Key result
Intracoronary administration of endothelin-1 in dogs induced fatal ventricular arrhythmias, including ventricular fibrillation in 11 of 12 cases, and significantly prolonged QT time (P<0.05).
Why the study?
Does intracoronary administration of endothelin-1 induce ventricular arrhythmias in dogs?
Does intracoronary administration of endothelin-1 induce ventricular arrhythmias in dogs?
p-value: p=<0.05
Intracoronary endothelin-1 induces fatal ventricular arrhythmias and QT prolongation in a canine model, suggesting an arrhythmogenic effect independent of ischemia.
No direct clinical implications; leaves open endothelin-1's role in human arrhythmogenesis.
In 12 anesthetized, open-chest mongrel dogs, endothelin-1 (ET-1) was infused into the left anterior descending coronary artery through an indwelling catheter at a dose of 30 pmol.min-1 for 30 min (n = 8). In four dogs the ET-1 dose was increased to 60 pmol/min for 10 min. Programmed electrical stimulation was used for electrophysiologic studies. Coronary blood flow was reduced by 32% on average without any ischemic ECG signs. QT time (186 +/- 3 ms vs. 218 +/- 6, p < 0.05, and 225 +/- 9, p < 0.05, p < 0.05). Ventricular irritability increased in all cases; ventricular extrasystoles, and nonsustained and sustained tachycardias occurred and, in 11 cases, ventricular fibrillation terminated the experiments. In two dogs, early afterdepolarization was recorded. Therefore, ET-1 is capable of inducing fatal ventricular arrythmias at least partly independent of its vasoconstrictor effect. QT prolongation appears to have a pathophysiologic role in this arrythmogenic effect.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tóth et al. (1995) studied Ventricular arrhythmias (n=12). Endothelin-1 was evaluated on QT time and ventricular arrhythmias (p=<0.05). Intracoronary administration of endothelin-1 in dogs induced fatal ventricular arrhythmias, including ventricular fibrillation in 11 of 12 cases, and significantly prolonged QT time (P<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: