Key result
ETA receptor antagonism with BQ-123 increased LAD transmural blood flow during pacing stress compared to vehicle.
Why the study?
Does ETA receptor antagonism improve blood flow to collateralized and noncollateralized myocardium during pacing stress in a swine model?
Does ETA receptor antagonism improve blood flow to collateralized and noncollateralized myocardium during pacing stress in a swine model?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
ETA receptor blockade improves blood flow to both collateralized and noncollateralized myocardium during pacing stress in a swine model.
We hypothesized that blood flow to collateralized and noncollateralized myocardium is improved by antagonism of endothelin (ET) A receptors. Coronary collateral development was stimulated by placing an ameroid constrictor around the left circumflex coronary artery (LCx; collateralized region) in 11 swine. After 35 +/- 2 days, the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD; noncollateralized region) was autoperfused at constant pressure using blood from a femoral artery. In group 1 (n = 6) transmural blood flow was measured using radioactive microspheres in the LAD, LCx, and border regions (i.e., area between LAD and LCx) during pacing stress while vehicle (phosphate-buffered saline) was infused into the LAD coronary artery (pace 1). Approximately 55 min later, a second period of pacing (pace 2) was performed in the presence of ETA receptor antagonism (BQ-123; 5 mg.ml-1.min-1 ic). In the time control group (group 2, n = 5) vehicle was infused during both pacing periods. Indexes of myocardial oxygen demand were similar between paces 1 and 2 in each group. Compared with the first pacing period, transmural blood flow (ml.100 g-1.min-1) was higher (P < 0.05) during ETA receptor antagonism (i.e., pace 2) in the LAD (105 +/- 8 vs. 139 +/- 9), border (51 +/- 5 vs. 83 +/- 7), and LCx regions (22 +/- 3 vs. 41 +/- 4, respectively) in group 1. In group 2, while perfusion in the border (98 +/- 17 vs. 103 +/- 16) and LCx regions (19 +/- 4 vs. 27 +/- 6) was similar in paces 1 and 2, LAD transmural flow was greater (134 +/- 9 vs. 160 +/- 13; P < 0.05) during the second pacing period. However, the percent increase in LAD flow comparing pace 1 with 2 was greater (P < 0.05) in group 1 (39 +/- 6%) compared with group 2 (20 +/- 7%). These data suggest that during the stress of pacing blood flow to collateralized and noncollateralized myocardium is improved in the presence of ETA receptor blockade.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Symons et al. (1997) studied Coronary collateral development (n=11). ETA receptor antagonism (BQ-123) vs. Vehicle (phosphate-buffered saline) was evaluated on Percent increase in LAD transmural blood flow during pacing stress (p=<0.05). ETA receptor antagonism with BQ-123 increased LAD transmural blood flow during pacing stress compared to vehicle.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: