Key result
Immune-chromatography testing demonstrated 98.2% sensitivity and 100% specificity for rotavirus, and 100% sensitivity and 99.7% specificity for adenovirus compared to ELISA.
Why the study?
Clinical features of viral gastroenteritis are indistinct, and quick, simple, low-cost diagnostic methods are needed for diagnosis and management in young children.
Does immunochromatography test (ICT) accurately detect rotavirus and adenovirus compared to ELISA in children under 5 with acute gastroenteritis?
Cross-Sectional (n=314)
No
Does immunochromatography test (ICT) accurately detect rotavirus and adenovirus compared to ELISA in children under 5 with acute gastroenteritis?
Effect estimate: 98.20% sensitivity and 100% specificity for rotavirus; 100% sensitivity and 99.7% specificity for adenovirus
Immunochromatography is a highly sensitive and specific, rapid, and simple alternative to ELISA for detecting rotavirus and adenovirus in children with acute gastroenteritis.
May support rapid ICT use for viral detection in pediatric gastroenteritis; leaves open prospective outcome validation.
Introduction The most frequent etiologies of viral gastroenteritis among young children are rotavirus and enteric adenovirus. The clinical signs and symptoms of viral gastroenteritis are not distinct enough to allow for diagnosis. For the diagnosis and treatment of acute gastroenteritis, it is preferable to use quick, simple, and low-cost procedures. This study was undertaken to determine efficacy of immune-chromatography test (ICT) in comparison with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to detect rotavirus and adenovirus antigen in fecal specimen among children less than 5 years of age with acute gastroenteritis. Materials and Methods In a cross-sectional observational study, 314 fecal samples were collected from children aged less than 5 years with acute gastroenteritis attending or admitted to a tertiary care hospital during the 1 year study period. Samples were tested for rotavirus and adenovirus antigen using ICT and ELISA. Results Among the 314 children evaluated, 112 (35.66%) had rotavirus infection, nine (2.86%) had adenovirus infection, and three (0.95%) had both rotavirus and adenovirus infection. This study found that ICT is 98.20% sensitive and 100% specific for the diagnosis of rotaviral diarrhea and 100% sensitive and 99.7% specific for adenovirus diarrhea, compared to ELISA. Conclusion Immunochromatography tests used for the detection of rotavirus and adenovirus in the fecal sample showed a high degree of sensitivity and specificity. The ICT is easy to perform and rapid, and it does not require any special equipment. Hence, the ICT could be used as an alternative method for detecting viral pathogens in clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bagali et al. (2022) conducted a cross-sectional in acute gastroenteritis (n=314). Immune-chromatography test (ICT) vs. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was evaluated on Diagnosis of rotaviral and adenovirus diarrhea (98.20% sensitivity and 100% specificity for rotavirus; 100% sensitivity and 99.7% specificity for adenovirus). Immune-chromatography testing demonstrated 98.2% sensitivity and 100% specificity for rotavirus, and 100% sensitivity and 99.7% specificity for adenovirus compared to ELISA.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: