Key result
STEMI and non-STEMI were associated with a significantly higher risk of ischemic stroke compared with unstable angina (HR 4.17, 95% CI 3.00-5.83 and HR 3.73, 95% CI 2.68-5.19, respectively).
Why the study?
Does acute coronary syndrome with cardiac injury (STEMI/non-STEMI) increase the risk of ischemic stroke compared to unstable angina?
Cohort (n=73,059)
Yes
Does acute coronary syndrome with cardiac injury (STEMI/non-STEMI) increase the risk of ischemic stroke compared to unstable angina?
Hazard Ratio: 4.17 (95% CI 3–5.83)
p-value: p=<0.001
STEMI and non-STEMI confer a similarly increased risk of ischemic stroke compared to unstable angina, suggesting cardiac injury is a key driver of post-ACS stroke risk.
May inform post-MI stroke surveillance; leaves open whether injury-specific prevention warrants dedicated trials.
BACKGROUND: Prior studies show an increased risk of ischemic stroke (IS) after myocardial infarction; however, there is limited evidence on long-term risk and whether it is directly related to cardiac injury. We hypothesized that the risk of IS after acute coronary syndrome is significantly higher if there is evidence of cardiac injury, such as ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) or non-STEMI, than when there is no evidence of cardiac injury, such as in unstable angina. METHODS AND RESULTS: Administrative claims data were obtained from all emergency department encounters and hospitalizations at California's nonfederal acute care hospitals between 2008 and 2011. Patients with STEMI, non-STEMI, and unstable angina were identified using appropriate International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes. The primary outcome was IS during 2 years of follow-up. Unadjusted and adjusted Cox proportional hazards models were used to determine the association between acute coronary syndrome subtype and IS risk. We identified 73 059 patients with a diagnosis of STEMI (n=26 427), non-STEMI (n=39 833), or unstable angina (n=6819) during the study period. In the fully adjusted models that included potential confounders such as atrial fibrillation and congestive heart failure, the risk of IS was higher with STEMI (hazard ratio 4.17, 95% CI 3.00-5.83; P<0.001) and non-STEMI (hazard ratio 3.73, 95% CI 2.68-5.19, P<0.001) compared with unstable angina. CONCLUSIONS: Non-STEMI and STEMI confer an equally increased risk of IS. Studies exploring IS mechanisms in cardiac patients are needed to improve and tailor stroke prevention strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yaghi et al. (2016) conducted a cohort in Acute Coronary Syndrome (n=73,059). STEMI and non-STEMI vs. Unstable angina was evaluated on Ischemic stroke during 2 years of follow-up (HR 4.17, 95% CI 3.00-5.83, p=<0.001). STEMI and non-STEMI were associated with a significantly higher risk of ischemic stroke compared with unstable angina (HR 4.17, 95% CI 3.00-5.83 and HR 3.73, 95% CI 2.68-5.19, respectively).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: