Key result
Radionuclide angiocardiography showed acceptable agreement with indicator dilution for stroke volume determination (83 vs 84 ml; mean difference -1 ml, NS; r = 0.74, P<0.001).
Why the study?
Does radionuclide angiocardiography using a double bolus and equilibrium technique accurately measure ventricular volumes and cardiac output compared to indicator dilution in patients with ischaemic heart disease?
Observational (n=18)
Does radionuclide angiocardiography using a double bolus and equilibrium technique accurately measure ventricular volumes and cardiac output compared to indicator dilution in patients with ischaemic heart disease?
Mean Difference: -1
Absolute Event Rate: 83% vs 84%
p-value: p=NS
Radionuclide angiocardiography using a double bolus and equilibrium technique provides accurate measurements of stroke volume and cardiac output comparable to the indicator dilution method.
Supports radionuclide angiocardiography for stroke volume assessment in ischaemic heart disease; leaves open prospective validation in broader cohorts.
Eighteen patients with ischaemic heart disease were studied. Left and right ventricular volumes including cardiac output (forward flow) were determined by radionuclide angiocardiography using a double bolus and equilibrium technique. As reference, cardiac output was simultaneously measured by indicator dilution. The radionuclide technique comprised four steps: (1) a first-pass study of right ventricle; (2) a bolus study of left ventricle; (3) an equilibrium study of left ventricle; (4) determination of the distribution volume of red blood cells. Absolute volumes of left ventricle were determined from steps 2 + 3 + 4. Absolute volumes of right ventricle were calculated from stroke volume and right ventricular ejection fraction (EF) which in turn was determined from step 1 by creating composite systolic and composite diastolic images. There was an acceptable agreement between stroke volume determinations by radionuclide angiocardiography and indicator dilution (r = 0.74; P less than 0.001). Stroke volume determination by radionuclide was 83 +/- 20 ml (mean +/- SD) and by indicator dilution 84 +/- 20 ml with a difference of -1 +/- 15 ml (NS). Cardiac output determination by radionuclide was 5.24 +/- 1.37 l min-1 and by indicator dilution 5.28 +/- 1.23 l min-1 with a difference of -0.04 +/- 0.95 l min-1 (NS). Left ventricular EF was 0.44 +/- 0.14 and right ventricular EF 0.57 +/- 0.10. The intra-observer coefficient of variation for duplicate calculations of the radionuclide determinations was 5.5% for stroke volume, 2.5% for left ventricular EF and 4.8% for right ventricular EF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stokholm et al. (1990) conducted an observational in ischaemic heart disease (n=18). Radionuclide angiocardiography using double bolus and equilibrium technique vs. Indicator dilution was evaluated on Stroke volume determination (MD -1 ml, p=NS). Radionuclide angiocardiography showed acceptable agreement with indicator dilution for stroke volume determination (83 vs 84 ml; mean difference -1 ml, NS; r = 0.74, P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: