Key result
Harmonizing gluten ELISA assays using a common calibrator reduced between-assay variability, but bias caused by differences in assay selectivity remained unaffected.
Population
Gluten ELISA assays/measurements
Comparison
Harmonization strategies including a common… vs Routine ELISA methods without harmonization
Design
Other
Authors
Loading...
ELISA variability undermines reliable EU gluten-free enforcement; leaves open need for consensus markers beyond reference materials.
Harmonizing gluten ELISA measurements using reference materials alone is insufficient due to differences in assay selectivity, requiring consensus on robust markers.
Rzychon et al. (2017) studied Gluten measurement. Harmonization of gluten ELISA assays (common extraction procedure, common calibrator) vs. Routine ELISA methods was evaluated on Comparability of measurements and between-assay variability. Harmonizing gluten ELISA assays using a common calibrator reduced between-assay variability, but bias caused by differences in assay selectivity remained unaffected.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: