Key result
Pulsed wave tissue Doppler imaging yielded higher mean E' velocities compared to color-coded tissue Doppler imaging, which can lead to misclassification of diastolic dysfunction if cut-off values are not adjusted.
Why the study?
Does PW-TDI yield different E' and E/E' values compared to CC-TDI in patients referred for evaluation of diastolic function?
Cross-Sectional (n=114)
Single-blind
No
Does PW-TDI yield different E' and E/E' values compared to CC-TDI in patients referred for evaluation of diastolic function?
PW-TDI yields significantly higher tissue velocity values than CC-TDI, which can lead to misclassification of diastolic dysfunction if the same E/E' cut-off values are used interchangeably.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Requires modality-specific E' cut-offs to avoid diastolic dysfunction misclassification; leaves open prospective validation of adjusted thresholds.
INTRODUCTION: Tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) plays an important role in assessing diastolic function using echocardiography. However, two different methods [pulsed wave (PW-TDI) and color-coded (CC-TDI)] are currently used. We aimed to compare both measurements. METHODS: We included 114 patients that were referred to our echocardiography department for evaluation of diastolic left ventricular function. In these patients, we sequentially measured tissue velocities of basal lateral and septal myocardium of the left ventricle in an apical four-chamber view with both PW-TDI and CC-TDI. RESULTS: Our cohort consisted of a heterogeneous group of patients with and without a history of cardiac disease. Mean age of the patients was 52 +/- 16.7 years, and 62% were males. We found a strong correlation between PW-TDI- and CC-TDI-derived myocardial velocities (r = 0.93; p = 0.001). However, E' (mean of lateral and septal) velocities measured with PW-TDI were consistently higher compared to CC-TDI values [PW-TDI E' 10.3 +/- 3.9 (SD) cm/s vs. CC-TDI E' 7.7 +/- 3.1 cm/s; p < 0.001]. From these data, we calculated that the relation between E' measured with PW-TDI and CC-TDI can be described as: E' (PW-TDI) = 1.25 + 1.17 x E' (CC-TDI). Consequently, E/E' measured with PW-TDI was consistently lower compared with CC-TDI (9.1 +/- 3.1 vs. 12.5 +/- 5.7; p < 0.001) From these data, we calculated that the relation between E/E' measured with PW-TDI and CC-TDI can be described as: E/E' (PW-TDI) = 2.13 + 0.56 x E/E' (CC-TDI). CONCLUSIONS: Despite a strong correlation, tissue velocities measured with PW-TDI will yield higher values as compared with CC-TDI. This should be taken into account when defining cut-off values for the evaluation of diastolic function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hummel et al. (2010) conducted a cross-sectional in Evaluation of diastolic left ventricular function (n=114). Pulsed wave tissue Doppler imaging (PW-TDI) vs. Color-coded tissue Doppler imaging (CC-TDI) was evaluated on Mean E' velocity (cm/s) (p=<0.001). Pulsed wave tissue Doppler imaging yielded higher mean E' velocities compared to color-coded tissue Doppler imaging, which can lead to misclassification of diastolic dysfunction if cut-off values are not adjusted.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: