Key result
The quadripolar LV Medtronic Performa lead reduced phrenic nerve stimulation occurrence at 8-month follow-up to 12% compared to 28% with bipolar configurations.
Why the study?
Does a quadripolar left ventricular lead improve reverse remodeling and reduce phrenic nerve stimulation in congestive heart failure patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy?
Cohort (n=158)
Yes
Does a quadripolar left ventricular lead improve reverse remodeling and reduce phrenic nerve stimulation in congestive heart failure patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy?
The use of a quadripolar LV lead in CRT patients facilitates targeted lead placement, promotes significant reverse remodeling, and effectively manages phrenic nerve stimulation through reprogramming.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Quadripolar LV leads were associated with targeted placement, reverse remodeling, and low PNS in CRT; leaves open randomized comparison versus bipolar leads.
BACKGROUND: To understand the impact of a quadripolar left ventricular (LV) lead on reverse remodeling and phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS) in congestive heart failure patients treated by cardiac resynchronization therapy at 8-month follow-up (FU). METHODS: One hundred and fifty-eight patients received an LV Medtronic Performa lead (Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) and were reevaluated at FU by echocardiography and measurement of electrical parameters. RESULTS: A targeted LV lead placement was achieved in 140 (89%) patients. Super responders and responders were 76 (50%) and 26 (18%), respectively, at FU; seven (4%) died and 13 (8%) were hospitalized for any cause. Nonischemic etiology was the only independent predictor of reverse remodeling. The configurations available only with the Performa leads reduced PNS occurrence at 8 V@0.4 ms from 43 (27%) to 14 (9%) of patients at implantation, and from 44 (28%) to 19 (12%) at last FU, compared to configurations available with bipolar leads. Patients with detectable PNS had >10/16 pacing configurations with a PNS safety margin >2 V both at implantation and at FU. During FU 16 (10%) patients had an adverse event possibly related to the lead or to modification of the underlying heart disease but 99% of these events were fixed by reprogramming of the pacing vector. CONCLUSIONS: Performa Lead enables an increased capability to achieve a targeted lead positioning in the broad clinical scenario of large- and small-volume implanting centers, with a relevant impact on the occurrence of reverse remodeling compared to literature data. The enhanced management of PNS resulted in a dislodgement rate of only 1%.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ziacchi et al. (2015) conducted a cohort in Congestive heart failure (n=158). LV Medtronic Performa lead vs. Bipolar lead configurations was evaluated on Phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS) occurrence at 8 V@0.4 ms at last follow-up. The quadripolar LV Medtronic Performa lead reduced phrenic nerve stimulation occurrence at 8-month follow-up to 12% compared to 28% with bipolar configurations.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: