Key result
Sustained and pulsatile neck pressure and neck suction produced comparable carotid baroreflex-mediated changes in mean arterial pressure (peak increase during NP 7 vs 7 mmHg; P>0.05).
Why the study?
Does pulsatile neck pressure or suction produce differential cardiovascular and sympathetic responses compared to sustained stimulation in humans?
Does pulsatile neck pressure or suction produce differential cardiovascular and sympathetic responses compared to sustained stimulation in humans?
Absolute Event Rate: 7% vs 7%
p-value: p=> 0.05
Sustained and pulsatile neck pressure and suction produce comparable carotid baroreflex-mediated cardiovascular and sympathetic responses in humans.
Comparable baroreflex responses support interchangeable use of sustained or pulsatile neck stimuli in research; leaves open clinical translation.
Although square-wave sustained and R wave-triggered pulsatile stimuli have been used to assess carotid baroreflex (CBR) function in humans, it remains unclear whether these different stimulus protocols elicit comparable responses and whether CBR responses adapt during prolonged stimulation. Thus, we measured muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA), heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) in response to +30 Torr neck pressure (NP) and -30 Torr neck suction (NS) delivered for 20 s either as a sustained or pulsatile stimulus. CBR-mediated changes in MSNA, HR and MAP were similar with sustained and pulsatile stimuli. The time course of MSNA and HR responses identified that significant changes occurred during the initial 5 s and were better maintained over 20 s with NP than with NS. Changes in MAP exhibited a slower onset with the peak increase during NP occurring at 10 s (sustained, 7 +/- 1 mmHg; pulsatile, 7 +/- 1 mmHg; P > 0.05) and the nadir during NS occurring at 20 s (sustained, -7 +/- 1 mmHg; pulsatile, -9 +/- 2 mmHg; P > 0.05). These data demonstrate that sustained and pulsatile NP and NS produce comparable CBR-mediated responses. Furthermore, despite MSNA and HR returning towards baseline during NS, CBR-mediated changes in MAP are well maintained over 20 s of NS and NP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ogoh et al. (2003) studied this question. Pulsatile neck pressure and neck suction vs. Sustained neck pressure and neck suction was evaluated on Peak increase in mean arterial pressure during neck pressure at 10 seconds (p=> 0.05). Sustained and pulsatile neck pressure and neck suction produced comparable carotid baroreflex-mediated changes in mean arterial pressure (peak increase during NP 7 vs 7 mmHg; P>0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: