Key result
Intravenous administration of diphenylhydantoin resulted in a fatal central nervous system toxic condition manifested by tonic seizure and respiratory arrest in a 67-year-old male.
Case Report (n=1)
Intravenous diphenylhydantoin can cause fatal central nervous system toxicity, highlighting the need for caution when using it as an antiarrhythmic agent.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
IV diphenylhydantoin may cause fatal CNS toxicity; single case leaves open its antiarrhythmic safety profile.
To the Editor:— Diphenylhydantoin sodium, originally introduced for the treatment of epilepsy, has been increasingly used in recent years for the treatment of cardiac arrhythmias, particularly those secondary to digitalis.1-3Although the drug has been considered safe,3several reports have appeared of fatalities after intravenous administration due to ventricular standstill,2,4,5ventricular fibrillation,6or hypotension and apnea.7The purpose of the present report is to describe an additional death with a different mechanism, a central nervous system toxic condition manifested by tonic seizure and respiratory arrest, and to comment upon possible means of preventing fatalities from intravenously administered diphenylhydantoin and other antiarrhythmic agents. Report of a Case:— The 67-year-old male patient was admitted to the Albany Veterans Administration Hospital on March 10, 1968, for increasing shortness of breath and orthopnea of one week's duration. The patient had had documented myocardial infarctions in 1957, 1966, and 1967.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maria A. Russell (1968) conducted a case report in Cardiac arrhythmias (n=1). Diphenylhydantoin sodium (intravenous) was evaluated on Death due to central nervous system toxic condition (tonic seizure and respiratory arrest). Intravenous administration of diphenylhydantoin resulted in a fatal central nervous system toxic condition manifested by tonic seizure and respiratory arrest in a 67-year-old male.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: