Key result
Frailty syndrome was associated with a lower rate of clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy compared to robust patients (63.0% vs 79.5%; OR 0.81; 95% CI 0.71-0.92; P=0.0008).
Why the study?
Response to CRT is important in advanced heart failure, especially in geriatric patients, but the impact of frailty syndrome on CRT response needed examination.
Does frailty syndrome predict the clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in elderly patients with heart failure?
Cohort (n=246)
No
Does frailty syndrome predict the clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in elderly patients with heart failure?
Frailty is an independent predictor of a reduced clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in elderly patients with heart failure.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Frailty associated with lower CRT response in elderly HF patients; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Background: The response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an important element of the treatment of advanced heart failure, especially in the geriatric population. The aim of the study was to examine the impact of frailty syndrome on the response to treatment with CRT. Methods: Two hundred and forty-six patients of 60 years or older (aged 73.35±6.95; 22.4% women) with an implanted CRT were included in this single-center prospective study. There was a 12-month follow-up. The Tilburg Frailty Indicator was used to determine frailty (5 or more points). The response to CRT was evaluated based on an analysis of clinical criteria. Results: One hundred and sixty-nine of 246 (68.9%) patients were found to be clinical CRT responders. Frailty syndrome was recognized in 173 (70.32%). There were 63.0% responders in the frailty-affected group, whereas there were statistically more responders (79.5%) in the robust group ( P =0.0116). In the logistic regression, frailty emerged as an independent predictor of the response to CRT (OR=0.81, 95% CI=0.71–0.92; P =0.0008). The area under the curve of the ROC curve for frailty in the responders to CRT was 0.62. The cut-off value for a designation of frailty was 6 ( P =0.0014). Conclusion: Frailty is a novel independent factor that can be used to predict the clinical response to CRT in the elderly population. Modifying the level of recognition in the Tilburg Frailty Indicator can improve the prediction of a response to CRT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Młynarska et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in advanced heart failure (n=246). Frailty syndrome vs. Robust (non-frail) was evaluated on Clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.71-0.92, p=0.0008). Frailty syndrome was associated with a lower rate of clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy compared to robust patients (63.0% vs 79.5%; OR 0.81; 95% CI 0.71-0.92; P=0.0008).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: