Key result
Higher waist circumference links to worse global cognition while subcutaneous adipose tissue correlates with better cognition.
Why the study?
Do clinical and CT-imaged adiposity measures correlate with cognitive function in middle-aged and older African Americans?
Cross-Sectional (n=652)
Do clinical and CT-imaged adiposity measures correlate with cognitive function in middle-aged and older African Americans?
Effect estimate: β -0.12 (95% CI -0.21 to -0.03)
Waist circumference may be the simplest and most efficient clinical measure of adiposity to assess cognitive risk in older African Americans, while subcutaneous fat showed a paradoxical protective association.
May guide risk assessment in older adults; hypothesis-generating for distinct adipose effects on cognition.
Background: Adiposity depots may differentially affect cognition. African Americans (AA) have higher rates of obesity and dementia but lower visceral adipose tissue (VAT) than whites, yet are underrepresented in studies of adiposity and cognition. Our study compared relations of cognitive function to clinical adiposity measures and computed tomography (CT)-imaged abdominal adiposity in AA. Methods: CT-imaged subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) and VAT measurements were obtained in the AA cohort of the Genetic Epidemiology Network of Arteriopathy Study (N = 652, mean age 68 ± 8.4 years, 74% females, 59% obese, 82% hypertensive). Clinical adiposity measures included waist circumference (WC) and body mass index (BMI). Global cognition was operationalized as a global cognitive z-score generated from the average of four cognitive domain z-scores. Generalized estimating equations were used to examine cross-sectional associations between individual standardized adiposity measures and cognition, accounting for age, sex, education, smoking status, and familial clustering. A collective model was constructed including multiple supported adiposity measures and age-by-adiposity interactions. Results: In the collective model, higher WC was associated with worse global cognition, β = -0.12 (95%CI: -0.21, -0.03); higher SAT was associated with better cognition, β = 0.09 (0.01, 0.18); higher BMI was associated with worse cognition at younger ages with attenuation at older ages (BMI-by-age-interaction p = .004). VAT was not significantly associated with global cognition, β = -0.03 (-0.07, 0.02). Conclusions: WC may be the simplest and most efficient measure of adiposity to assess with respect to cognition in clinical settings, although studies to determine mechanistic effects of subcutaneous and other adiposity depots on cognition are warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Parker et al. (2017) conducted a cross-sectional in Cognitive function (n=652). Adiposity measures (waist circumference, BMI, SAT, VAT) was evaluated on Global cognition (global cognitive z-score) (β -0.12, 95% CI -0.21 to -0.03). Higher waist circumference was associated with worse global cognition (β = -0.12; 95% CI -0.21 to -0.03), whereas higher subcutaneous adipose tissue was associated with better cognition.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: