Key result
Older donor age was independently associated with an increased risk of developing significant postoperative tricuspid regurgitation (HR 1.06) after heart transplantation.
Why the study?
Does anastomotic technique or donor age affect the long-term incidence of atrioventricular valve regurgitation in heart transplant recipients?
Population
201 adults who underwent orthotopic heart transplantation at a single center in South Korea. Key inclusion…
Comparison
Heart transplantation using bicaval anastomosis… vs Heart transplantation using standard anastomosis…
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
mean 89.9±54.3 months
Authors
Loading...
Long-term post-transplant regurgitation data now quantified; leaves open whether findings should alter surveillance protocols.
Cohort (n=201)
No
Does anastomotic technique or donor age affect the long-term incidence of atrioventricular valve regurgitation in heart transplant recipients?
Hazard Ratio: 1.06 (95% CI 1.01–1.12)
p-value: p=0.012
Long-term atrioventricular valve function after heart transplantation is excellent regardless of anastomotic technique, though older donor age is an independent predictor of postoperative tricuspid regurgitation.
Kim et al. (2014) conducted a cohort in Heart transplantation (n=201). Older donor age vs. Younger donor age was evaluated on Significant tricuspid regurgitation (moderate-to-severe) (HR 1.06, 95% CI 1.01-1.12, p=0.012). Older donor age was independently associated with an increased risk of developing significant postoperative tricuspid regurgitation (HR 1.06) after heart transplantation.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: