Key result
CRT improves clinical response by ~46% vs control, with longer QRS and lower LVEF predicting benefit.
Why the study?
Does cardiac resynchronization therapy improve the clinical composite score at 6 months in patients with symptomatic heart failure and QRS prolongation?
Meta-Analysis (n=1,591)
Double-blind
Randomized
Yes
Does cardiac resynchronization therapy improve the clinical composite score at 6 months in patients with symptomatic heart failure and QRS prolongation?
Absolute Event Rate: 60% vs 41%
In patients with symptomatic chronic heart failure, longer QRS duration and lower LVEF independently predict early clinical improvement at 6 months with cardiac resynchronization therapy.
AIMS: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) reduces morbidity and mortality in patients with symptomatic heart failure and QRS prolongation but there is uncertainty about which patient characteristics predict short-term clinical response. METHODS AND RESULTS: In an individual patient meta-analysis of three double-blind, randomized trials, clinical composite score (CCS) at 6 months was compared in patients assigned to CRT programmed on or off. Treatment-covariate interactions were assessed to measure likelihood of improved CCS at 6 months. MIRACLE, MIRACLE ICD, and REVERSE trials contributed data for this analysis (n = 1591). Multivariable modelling identified QRS duration and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) as predictors of CRT clinical response (P < 0.05). The odds ratio for a better CCS at 6 months increased by 3.7% for every 1% decrease in LVEF for patients assigned to CRT-on compared to CRT-off, and was greatest when QRS duration was between 160 and 180 ms. CONCLUSIONS: In symptomatic chronic heart failure patients (NYHA class II-IV), longer QRS duration and lower LVEF independently predict early clinical response to CRT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Linde et al. (2017) conducted a meta-analysis in Symptomatic chronic heart failure (n=1,591). Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) vs. CRT programmed off (backup right ventricular pacing) was evaluated on Clinical Composite Score (CCS) at 6 months (proportion Improved). Cardiac resynchronization therapy improved clinical response at 6 months (60% vs 41% improved), with longer QRS duration and lower LVEF independently predicting greater benefit.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: