Key result
FMD double emulsion vaccine outperforms aluminum gel in sheep by maintaining neutralizing antibodies for ~90 days.
Why the study?
Does FMD virus quadrivalent double emulsion vaccine improve immune response in sheep compared to aluminum hydroxide gel vaccine?
Does FMD virus quadrivalent double emulsion vaccine improve immune response in sheep compared to aluminum hydroxide gel vaccine?
Quadrivalent double emulsion FMD vaccines elicit a superior and more rapid immune response in sheep compared to aluminum hydroxide gel vaccines.
Animal data favor double emulsion FMD vaccine in sheep; leaves open translation to field use or other species.
Despite representing the majority of the world's foot-and-mouth disease (FMD)-susceptible livestock, sheep and goats have generally been neglected with regard to their epidemiological role in the spread of FMD. In the present investigations, FMD virus quadrivalent double emulsion (Montanide ISA 206) vaccines were tested in sheep. The oil adjuvant elicited a better immune response at any time than did aluminum hydroxide gel vaccine, and the response developed quicker. The animals maintained their neutralizing antibody titers at >3 log(10) for the duration of the trial (90 days). Sheep were found to be late responders to serotypes A, C, and Asia-1; a clear upward shift in titer was observed at 60 days postvaccination. However, development of the immune response to serotype O in sheep was superior to that in cattle and goats.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Patil et al. (2002) studied Foot-and-mouth disease. FMD virus quadrivalent double emulsion (Montanide ISA 206) vaccine vs. Aluminum hydroxide gel vaccine was evaluated on Immune response (neutralizing antibody titers). FMD virus quadrivalent double emulsion vaccine elicited a better immune response in sheep than aluminum hydroxide gel vaccine, maintaining neutralizing antibody titers >3 log(10) for 90 days.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: