Key result
Prophylactic IM ephedrine cuts hemodynamic perturbations ~53% vs saline during spinal anesthesia.
Why the study?
The sympatholytic effect of dexmedetomidine during spinal anesthesia may exacerbate hypotension and bradycardia, prompting investigation into whether prophylactic intramuscular ephedrine could prevent these hemodynamic perturbations.
Does prophylactic intramuscular ephedrine prevent hemodynamic perturbations in patients receiving spinal anesthesia and dexmedetomidine sedation?
RCT (n=116)
Double-blind
Computerized randomized table
No
Does prophylactic intramuscular ephedrine prevent hemodynamic perturbations in patients receiving spinal anesthesia and dexmedetomidine sedation?
Absolute Event Rate: 26.3% vs 55.9%
p-value: p=0.001
Prophylactic intramuscular ephedrine significantly reduces the incidence of hypotension and bradycardia in patients undergoing spinal anesthesia with dexmedetomidine sedation without increasing hypertension or tachycardia.
Dexmedetomidine is used for sedation during spinal anesthesia. The sympatholytic effect of dexmedetomidine may exacerbate hypotension and bradycardia with spinal anesthesia. This study investigated the effects of prophylactic intramuscular injection of ephedrine in preventing hypotension and bradycardia occurring through combined use of spinal anesthesia and dexmedetomidine. One hundred sixteen patients scheduled for lower extremity orthopedic surgery were randomized into two groups receiving either ephedrine 20 mg intramuscularly or equivalent amount of 0.9% NaCl, both with dexmedetomidine and spinal anesthesia. The primary endpoint was the incidence of hemodynamic perturbations (hypotension or bradycardia event). The secondary endpoint was a rescue doses of ephedrine and atropine. The incidence of hemodynamic perturbations was significantly lower in the ephedrine group compared with to the saline group (26.3% versus 55.9%, p = 0.001). The rescue doses of atropine (0.09 ± 0.21 versus 0.28 ± 0.41, p = 0.001) and ephedrine (1.04 ± 2.89 versus 2.03 ± 3.25, p = 0.007) were also significantly lower in the ephedrine group. There was no differences in number of patients with hypertensive (7.0% versus 11.9%, p = 0.375) or tachycardia (1.8% versus 3.4% p = 0.581) episodes. The use of ephedrine intramuscular injections may be a safe and efficacious option in preventing hemodynamic perturbations in patients who received spinal anesthesia and sedation using dexmedetomidine.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Park et al. (2020) conducted an RCT in Patients undergoing lower extremity orthopedic surgery under spinal anesthesia with dexmedetomidine sedation (n=116). Ephedrine vs. 0.9% NaCl (saline) intramuscularly was evaluated on Incidence of hemodynamic perturbations (hypotension or bradycardia event) (p=0.001). Prophylactic intramuscular injection of 20 mg ephedrine significantly reduced the incidence of hemodynamic perturbations compared to saline (26.3% vs 55.9%, p=0.001) during spinal anesthesia.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: