Key result
Intracoronary 99mTc-tetrofosmin demonstrates ~79% agreement with intravenous injection for myocardial perfusion and wall motion.
Why the study?
Does intracoronary injection of 99mTc-tetrofosmin improve the detection of myocardial viability and wall motion compared to intravenous injection in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Cross-Sectional (n=14)
Does intracoronary injection of 99mTc-tetrofosmin improve the detection of myocardial viability and wall motion compared to intravenous injection in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Effect estimate: kappa 0.70
p-value: p=<0.0001
Intracoronary and intravenous injections of 99mTc-tetrofosmin provide comparable myocardial perfusion scores and wall motion assessments, though intracoronary injection may slightly reduce underestimation of myocardial viability.
Supports intracoronary 99mTc-tetrofosmin as a feasible alternative for perfusion imaging in acute MI; leaves open superiority for viability detection.
OBJECTIVES: The accuracy of viability and defect size detection by Tc-tetrofosmin has been discussed by several authors. The lower myocardial extraction fraction of the latter compared with Tc-sestamibi or Tl has often been emphasized. We hypothesized that the intracoronary (i.c.) injection of tracer activity, i.e. higher than that theoretically achievable in the case of intravenous (i.v.) administration, could demonstrate the clinical relevance of this finding intra-individually. In this study, myocardial perfusion images obtained after tracer injection down the infarct-related artery were compared with i.v. injection images in the same patients. The trial also provided us with the opportunity to compare the wall motion values calculated using conventional Tc-tetrofosmin gated single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) studies with those obtained using optimal target/background ratios after i.c. injection. METHODS: Fourteen patients with acute myocardial infarction, no history of previous cardiac events, single vessel disease and no visible collaterals in the coronary arteriogram were included in the study. Electrocardiogram gated SPECT was carried out separately after i.c. and i.v. injections of the tracer within 5-7 days following thrombolytic therapy. Myocardial perfusion patterns were compared by contingency table analysis after semi-quantitative visual scoring. Segmental wall motion was compared using quantified polar map data in a subset of patients (eight of 14) with normal to moderately hypoperfused myocardium supplied by the left coronary artery. RESULTS: Visual perfusion scores of both studies showed good concordance (kappa, 0.70), with complete agreement in 94 of 119 segments. Nearly all of the discordant segments (24 of 25) were mildly better scored in i.c. studies than in i.v. studies. The mean wall motion values calculated on polar maps of 78 segments for i.c. and i.v. studies were 8.4 +/- 1.2 mm and 8.2 +/- 1.3 mm (mean Delta wall motion=0.23 mm), respectively. High segmental wall motion correlation was observed (R=0.90; P<0.0001). CONCLUSION: It can be concluded that infarct-related myocardial perfusion scores obtained after i.c. and i.v. injections of Tc-tetrofosmin compare favourably, with a total agreement rate of 79%. However, the additional information obtained in 21% of the total number of myocardial segments by i.c. injection may indicate a mild underestimation of myocardial viability by i.v. injection. Conventional gated SPECT using i.v. Tc-tetrofosmin was demonstrated to be a reliable technique in the detection of true wall motion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Başoğlu et al. (2004) conducted a cross-sectional in Acute myocardial infarction (n=14). Intracoronary injection of 99mTc-tetrofosmin vs. Intravenous injection of 99mTc-tetrofosmin was evaluated on Myocardial perfusion patterns and segmental wall motion (kappa 0.70, p=<0.0001). Intracoronary injection of 99mTc-tetrofosmin compared favorably with intravenous injection for myocardial perfusion scores (79% agreement, kappa 0.70) and wall motion correlation (R=0.90, P<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: