Key result
CA125 ≥63.5 U/mL, unlike NT-proBNP, associates with congestive intrarenal venous flow in acute heart failure.
Why the study?
Intrarenal venous flow measured by Doppler ultrasound is a potential surrogate marker of renal congestion, but whether CA125 and NT-proBNP are associated with congestive patterns in acute heart failure was unknown.
Are CA125 and NT-proBNP associated with congestive intrarenal venous flow patterns in patients with acute heart failure?
Cohort (n=70)
Are CA125 and NT-proBNP associated with congestive intrarenal venous flow patterns in patients with acute heart failure?
CA125, but not NT-proBNP, is a useful surrogate marker for identifying congestive intrarenal venous flow patterns in patients with acute heart failure.
CA125 may identify intrarenal venous congestion in acute HF; hypothesis-generating for clinical use pending prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: Intrarenal venous flow (IRVF) measured by Doppler ultrasound has gained interest as a potential surrogate marker of renal congestion and adverse outcomes in heart failure. In this work, we aimed to determine if antigen carbohydrate 125 (CA125) and plasma amino-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) are associated with congestive IRVF patterns (i.e., biphasic and monophasic) in acute heart failure (AHF). METHODS AND RESULTS: We prospectively enrolled a consecutive cohort of 70 patients hospitalized for AHF. Renal Doppler ultrasound was assessed within the first 24-h of hospital admission. The mean age of the sample was 73.5 ± 12.3 years; 47.1% were female, and 42.9% exhibited heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. The median (interquartile range) for NT-proBNP and CA125 were 6149 (3604-12 330) pg/mL and 64 (37-122) U/mL, respectively. The diagnostic performance of both exposures for identifying congestive IRVF patterns was tested using the receiving operating curve (ROC). The cut-off for CA125 of 63.5 U/mL showed a sensibility and specificity of 67% and 74% and an area under the ROC curve of 0.71. After multivariate adjustment, CA125 remained non-linearly and positively associated with congestive IRVF (P-value = 0.008) and emerged as the most important covariate explaining the variability of the model (R2: 47.5%). Under the same multivariate setting, NT-proBNP did not show to be associated with congestive IRVF patterns (P-value = 0.847). CONCLUSIONS: CA125 and not NT-proBNP is a useful marker for identifying patients with AHF and congestive IRVF patterns.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Núñez‐Marín et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in acute heart failure (n=70). CA125 and NT-proBNP was evaluated on congestive intrarenal venous flow (IRVF) patterns (AUC 0.71, p=0.008). CA125 levels ≥63.5 U/mL, but not NT-proBNP, were significantly associated with congestive intrarenal venous flow patterns in patients with acute heart failure (P=0.008).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: