Key result
Dedicated CRT pre-assessment identifies likely non-responders, with CPET ≤ 12 ml/kg/min predicting therapy failure.
Why the study?
Pre-procedural assessment for cardiac resynchronization therapy is heterogenous, and unfavorable characteristics may account for non-response.
Does a dedicated CRT pre-assessment clinic incorporating CMR and CPET effectively select patients and predict response to CRT?
Cohort
Does a dedicated CRT pre-assessment clinic incorporating CMR and CPET effectively select patients and predict response to CRT?
A dedicated CRT pre-assessment clinic utilizing CMR and CPET can effectively identify patients unlikely to respond to CRT, thereby optimizing patient selection.
May support CPET-guided CRT selection in observational cohorts; leaves open need for randomized validation before practice change.
BACKGROUND: Pre-procedural assessment of patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is heterogenous and patients implanted with unfavorable characteristics may account for non-response. A dedicated CRT pre-assessment clinic (CRT PAC) was developed to standardize the review process and undertake structured pre-procedural evaluation. The aim of this analysis was to determine the effectiveness on patient selection and outcomes. METHODS: A prospective database of consecutive patients attending the CRT PAC between 2013 and 2018 was analyzed. Pre-operative assessment included cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). Patients were considered CRT responders based on improvement in clinical composite score (CCS) and/or reduction in left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) ≥ 15% at 6-months follow-up. RESULTS: ≤ 12 ml/kg/min on CPET predicted CRT non-response. Two patients were unsuitable for CRT as they had end-stage heart failure and died during follow-up. The majority of patients initially deemed unsuitable for CRT did not suffer from unexpected hospitalization for decompensated heart failure or died from cardiovascular disease; only 8 patients (13%) received CRT devices during follow-up because of symptomatic left ventricular systolic impairment. CONCLUSION: A dedicated CRT PAC is able to appropriately select patients for CRT. Pre-procedural investigation/imaging can identify patients unlikely to respond to, or may not yet be suitable for CRT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sidhu et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Heart failure evaluated for cardiac resynchronization therapy. Dedicated CRT pre-assessment clinic (CRT PAC) was evaluated on CRT response (improvement in clinical composite score and/or reduction in left ventricular end-systolic volume ≥ 15% at 6-months follow-up). A dedicated CRT pre-assessment clinic identified patients unlikely to respond, with ≤ 12 ml/kg/min on CPET predicting CRT non-response.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: