Key result
Point shear-wave elastography detects greater tissue elasticity in subclinical rejection but lacks independent predictive value.
Why the study?
The feasibility of point shear-wave elastography in evaluating stable renal allograft function and detecting subclinical rejection was investigated.
Does point shear-wave elastography distinguish between subclinical rejection and non-rejection in patients with stable renal allografts?
Cross-Sectional (n=95)
Does point shear-wave elastography distinguish between subclinical rejection and non-rejection in patients with stable renal allografts?
Absolute Event Rate: 31% vs 24.5%
p-value: p=0.016
Point shear-wave elastography is a feasible non-invasive tool that shows greater tissue elasticity in subclinical rejection compared to non-rejection in stable renal allografts, though it was not an independent predictor on multivariate analysis.
May support noninvasive monitoring of renal allografts; leaves open independent diagnostic utility pending prospective validation.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the feasibility of point shear-wave elastography (SWE) in evaluating patients with stable renal allograft function who underwent protocol biopsies. METHODS: 95 patients with stable renal allograft function that underwent ultrasound-guided biopsies at predefined time points (10 days or 1 year after transplantation) were enrolled. Ultrasound and point SWE examinations were performed immediately before protocol biopsies. Patients were categorized into two groups: subclinical rejection (SCR) and non-SCR. Tissue elasticity (kPa) on SWE was measured in the cortex of all renal allografts. RESULTS: SCR was pathologically confirmed in 34 patients. Tissue elasticity of the SCR group (31.0 kPa) was significantly greater than that of the non-SCR group (24.5 kPa) (=0.016), while resistive index value did not show a significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.112). Tissue elasticity in renal allografts demonstrated significantly moderate negative correlation with estimated glomerular filtration rate (correlation coefficient = -0.604, p < 0.001). Tissue elasticity was not independent factor for SCR prediction on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: As a non-invasive tool, point SWE appears feasible in distinguishing between patients with SCR and without SCR in stable functioning renal allografts. Moreover, it may demonstrate the functional state of renal allografts. Advances in knowledge: On point SWE, SCR has greater tissue elasticity than non-SCR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2017) conducted a cross-sectional in Stable renal allograft function (n=95). Subclinical rejection (SCR) vs. Non-subclinical rejection (non-SCR) was evaluated on Tissue elasticity (kPa) on point shear-wave elastography (p=0.016). Point shear-wave elastography showed greater tissue elasticity in subclinical rejection (31.0 vs 24.5 kPa, p=0.016), though it was not an independent predictor on multivariate analysis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: