Key result
High in-hospital D-dimer linked to ~460% higher mortality risk in acute aortic syndromes.
Why the study?
The diagnostic role and prognostic value of D-dimer in patients with intramural hematoma or penetrating aortic ulcer were unknown.
Does D-dimer measurement accurately diagnose acute aortic syndrome subtypes and predict mortality in patients presenting with suspected acute aortic syndrome?
Population
231 patients with acute aortic syndrome and 291 control patients without AAS
Comparison
D-dimer measurement at admission and during hospitalization vs control patients without AAS; D-dimer ≥9.0 mg/L vs <9.0 mg/L
Design
Observational cohort study
Follow-up
In-hospital and 3 years
Authors
Loading...
May support D-dimer for diagnosis and risk stratification in acute aortic syndrome; leaves open prospective validation before practice change.
Observational (n=522)
Does D-dimer measurement accurately diagnose acute aortic syndrome subtypes and predict mortality in patients presenting with suspected acute aortic syndrome?
Odds Ratio: 5.6
p-value: p=0.022
D-dimer is highly sensitive for diagnosing acute aortic dissection and intramural hematoma but not penetrating aortic ulcer, and significantly elevated in-hospital levels predict short-term mortality.
Gorla et al. (2015) conducted an observational in Acute aortic syndromes (n=522). D-dimer levels vs. Controls without AAS or lower D-dimer levels was evaluated on In-hospital mortality (OR 5.60, p=0.022). In-hospital D-dimer levels ≥9 mg/L independently predicted in-hospital mortality (OR 5.60, p=0.022), while a 0.5 mg/L cutoff was highly sensitive for diagnosing AAD and IMH.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: