Key result
Portocaval shunt increases rat cardiac output by ~64% alongside generalized circulatory disturbances.
Why the study?
It was unclear whether increased portal venous inflow after portocaval shunt in rats results from selective splanchnic vasodilatation or generalized circulatory disturbance.
Population
17 rats (9 with portocaval shunt, 8 sham-operated controls)
Comparison
Portocaval shunt vs sham-operated controls
Design
Preclinical experimental study
Follow-up
2 weeks
Authors
Loading...
Urges caution extrapolating rat shunt hemodynamics to patients; extends animal models of generalized hypercirculation but leaves open human relevance.
Absolute Event Rate: 46.2% vs 28.2%
p-value: p=<0.001
Portocaval shunt in rats leads to a generalized hyperkinetic circulation rather than selective splanchnic vasodilatation, which correlates with increased plasma glucagon levels.
Kravetz et al. (1987) studied Portocaval shunt (n=17). Portocaval shunt (PCS) vs. Sham-operated controls was evaluated on Cardiac output (ml/min/100g) (p=<0.001). Portocaval shunt in rats significantly increased cardiac output (46.2 vs 28.2 ml/min/100g, P<0.001) and portal venous inflow as part of a generalized circulatory disturbance.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: