Key result
In patients with structural heart disease after ventricular tachycardia ablation, left ventricular assist device implantation resulted in similar survival compared to a matched control group (log-rank p=0.761), whereas heart transplantation was associated with 100% survival.
Why the study?
Ablation of ventricular tachycardias in patients with structural heart disease is associated with advanced heart failure and poor survival, but the impact of LVAD implantation and heart transplantation on long-term outcomes after VT ablation is unclear.
Does LVAD implantation or heart transplantation improve long-term survival in patients with structural heart disease after catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia?
Case-Control (n=42)
No
Does LVAD implantation or heart transplantation improve long-term survival in patients with structural heart disease after catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia?
Absolute Event Rate: 43% vs 33%
p-value: p=0.525
In patients with structural heart disease undergoing VT ablation, subsequent heart transplantation is associated with excellent long-term survival, whereas LVAD implantation yields survival similar to matched controls.
Supports evaluation of heart transplantation after VT ablation; leaves open LVAD benefit versus matched controls in this observational cohort.
INTRODUCTION: Ablation of ventricular tachycardias (VTs) in patients with structural heart disease (SHD) has been associated with advanced heart failure and poor survival. METHODS AND RESULTS: This matched case-control study sought to assess the difference in survival after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation and/or heart transplantation (HTX) in SHD patients undergoing VT ablation. From the initial cohort of 309 SHD patients undergoing VT ablation (187 ischemic cardiomyopathy, mean age 64 ± 12 years, ejection fraction of 34 ± 13%), 15 patients received an LVAD and nine patients HTX after VT ablation during a follow-up period of 44 ± 33 months. Long-term survival after LVAD did not differ from the matched control group (p = 0.761), although the cause of lethal events was different. All post-HTX patients survived during follow-up. CONCLUSION: In this matched case-control study on patients with SHD undergoing VT ablation, patients that received LVAD implantation had similar survival compared to the control group after 4‑year follow-up, while the patients with HTX had a significantly better outcome.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Darma et al. (2021) conducted a case-control in Structural heart disease after catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia (n=42). Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation or heart transplantation (HTX) vs. Matched control group (no LVAD or HTX) was evaluated on Mortality (p=0.525). In patients with structural heart disease after ventricular tachycardia ablation, left ventricular assist device implantation resulted in similar survival compared to a matched control group (log-rank p=0.761), whereas heart transplantation was associated with 100% survival.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: