Key result
Coroflex Please DES shows ~8% TLR rate, with higher MACE in European versus Asian patients.
Why the study?
Randomized trials assess device potential in defined indications, while all-comer studies reveal device performance in real clinical environments.
Observational (n=1,230)
Yes
The Coroflex Please drug-eluting stent demonstrated acceptable 10-month rates of target lesion revascularization and MACE in a real-world, all-comers population, though MACE rates were higher in European compared to Asian patients.
Real-world Coroflex Please DES yields acceptable MACE rates; extends prior data but leaves open regional TLR and high-risk ACS subgroup differences.
BACKGROUND: Randomized trials assess the potential of a medical device in well defined indications while "all comer studies" reveal the device performance in the real clinical environment. AIMS: This 'all comers' registry assessed the 10-month outcome of the Coroflex(®) Please drug-eluting stent in Europe and Asia by clinically driven major adverse cardiac events. METHODS: The Coroflex(®) Please Registry was an international, prospective, multicenter registry enrolling patients with symptomatic ischemic heart disease. The primary endpoint was clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 9 months. Secondary endpoints were technical success, in-hospital outcomes, definite stent thrombosis and major adverse cardiac events (death, myocardial infarction, or TLR) for subgroup analyses. RESULTS: Of the enrolled 1230 patients (63.6 ± 11.2 years, 33.9% diabetics), 339 (27.6%) had an acute coronary syndrome, 148 (12.1%) STEMI and 191 (15.6%) NSTEMI. After 10.5 ± 3.8 months (follow-up rate 92.8%), the target lesion revascularization rate (TLR) was 7.8% overall, 8.3% in STEMI, and 11.3% in NSTEMI patients. Total MACE was 11.1% and significantly higher in ACS with either diabetes mellitus (22.9%, p = 0.017) or age ≥75 years (25.4%, p = 0.026). In European and Asian patients MI rates (5.2% vs 3.1%, p = 0.135) and cardiac death rates (1.6% vs 0.9%, p = 0.414) were similar. The MACE rate was higher in Europe (13.6% vs 4.7%, p < 0.001) driven by a six times higher TLR rate. CONCLUSIONS: TLR and MACE occurred within the range of previously published data. The incidence of MI and cardiac death were not different between Europe and Asia. MACE were higher in Europe driven by target lesion revascularization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leschke et al. (2012) conducted an observational in symptomatic ischemic heart disease (n=1,230). Coroflex Please drug-eluting stent was evaluated on clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 9 months. The Coroflex Please drug-eluting stent demonstrated an overall target lesion revascularization rate of 7.8% at 10.5 months, with higher MACE rates in European compared to Asian patients (13.6% vs 4.7%).
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: