Key result
RV pacing ≥20% linked to ~616% higher heart failure admission risk alongside wide paced QRS.
Why the study?
Right ventricular pacing-induced dyssynchrony can lead to progressive LV dysfunction and symptomatic heart failure requiring hospitalization, but predictors of this progression in pacemaker recipients are unclear.
Do prolonged paced QRS duration and high right ventricular pacing burden predict heart failure admission in pacemaker recipients?
Cohort (n=200)
Do prolonged paced QRS duration and high right ventricular pacing burden predict heart failure admission in pacemaker recipients?
Hazard Ratio: 2.98
p-value: p=0.011 and 0.009
Combined assessment of paced QRS duration (≥168 ms) and right ventricular pacing burden (≥20%) can identify pacemaker recipients at high risk for progression to symptomatic heart failure requiring admission.
May support closer HF surveillance in high-risk pacemaker recipients; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before guiding interventions.
Background Right ventricular (RV) pacing-induced dyssynchrony can lead to progressive left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. Although a decline in LV ejection fraction (LVEF) after pacemaker implantation is common, the transition to symptomatic heart failure (HF) requiring hospitalization (HF admission; HFA) represents a more clinically meaningful progression to Stages C/D. Objective To determine whether paced QRS duration (pQRS) and RV pacing burden (RVp) independently or jointly predict HFA in pacemaker recipients followed with remote monitoring. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 200 pacemaker recipients actively followed with remote monitoring. pQRS at implantation and RVp during follow-up were evaluated as markers of baseline electrical dyssynchrony and cumulative pacing exposure. The primary endpoint was HFA, and the secondary endpoint was all-cause mortality. Results During a median follow-up of 4.5 years, 27 patients (13.5%) developed HFA. Patients with HFA had longer pQRS (171±18 vs. 156±20 ms, p <0.001) and higher RVp (median 99% vs. 38%, p =0.002). In a multivariable Cox model, both pQRS ≥168 ms (HR 2.98, p=0.011) and RVp ≥20% (HR 7.16, p =0.009) and age independently predicted HFA. Neither pQRS nor RVp predicted all-cause mortality, which was associated only with age. Conclusion PQRS and RVp jointly identify patients at high risk of progression from clinical to symptomatic HF (Stages C/D). While mortality in this population is primarily age-driven, HFA reflects a modifiable consequence of pacing-related dyssynchrony. Combined assessment of pQRS and RVp may facilitate early identification of high-risk patients who could benefit from closer monitoring or alternative pacing strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ueyama et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Pacemaker recipients (n=200). Paced QRS duration ≥168 ms and right ventricular pacing burden ≥20% vs. Shorter paced QRS duration and lower right ventricular pacing burden was evaluated on Heart failure admission (HFA) (HR 2.98 for pQRS ≥168 ms; HR 7.16 for RVp ≥20%, p=0.011 and 0.009). Paced QRS duration ≥168 ms (HR 2.98, P=0.011) and right ventricular pacing burden ≥20% (HR 7.16, P=0.009) independently predicted heart failure admission in pacemaker recipients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: