Key result
Cardiac contraction inhibits mid-wall blood flow ~71% in ischemic myocardium versus normal tissue.
Why the study?
The effect of cardiac contraction on overall blood flow in areas supplied by coronary collateral vessels was not fully understood.
Does cardiac contraction inhibit coronary collateral blood flow in an ischemic region?
Does cardiac contraction inhibit coronary collateral blood flow in an ischemic region?
Absolute Event Rate: 71% vs 33%
Cardiac contraction significantly inhibits collateral blood flow to an ischemic region, with the effect being particularly magnified at the mid wall.
May limit systolic collateral flow in ischemic zones; leaves open relevance to human outcomes or therapy.
The present study was undertaken to determine the effect of contraction on overall flow in an area supplied by collateral vessels. Changes in the distribution of blood flow across the wall of ischemic and normally perfused regions of the left ventricle were observed during normal beating and during vagal arrest. The main left coronary artery was cannulated and perfused at constant pressure (125 mmHg) using a servo pump apparatus. An ischemic area supplied by collaterals was created by ligating the left anterior descending artery. Radiomicrospheres (15 micrometer) were injected into the perfusion apparatus during beating. Then spheres with a different label were administered to the same heart during arrest. The results revealed that beating caused a gradient of blood flow inhibition from near zero at the epicardium to about 50% at the endocardium in both zones. Inhibition to flow at the mid wall of the ischemic zone, 71%, was significantly greater than that seen at the corresponding depth in the normally perfused region, 33%. These results indicate that contraction not only inhibits collateral blood flow to an ischemic region, but also that the inhibition is actually magnified at the mid wall.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Russell et al. (1977) studied Myocardial ischemia. Cardiac contraction (beating) vs. Vagal arrest was evaluated on Blood flow inhibition at the mid wall. Cardiac contraction caused significantly greater blood flow inhibition at the mid wall of the ischemic zone (71%) compared to the normally perfused region (33%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: