Key result
ICE-guided electrified J-wire cuts trans-septal puncture time vs. conventional BRK needle with similar safety.
Why the study?
Application of electrocautery to a J-wire is used to perform transseptal puncture but has limited evidence supporting safety and efficacy.
Does ICE-guided electrified J-wire transseptal puncture improve procedural efficiency and safety compared to conventional Brockenbrough needle in patients undergoing transseptal puncture?
RCT (n=200)
1:1
Does ICE-guided electrified J-wire transseptal puncture improve procedural efficiency and safety compared to conventional Brockenbrough needle in patients undergoing transseptal puncture?
ICE-guided electrified J-wire transseptal puncture is as safe as and more efficient than conventional Brockenbrough needle puncture, significantly reducing transseptal puncture time.
Electrified J-wire enables faster ICE-guided transseptal access with equivalent safety; supports adoption and larger outcome trials.
Background: Application of electrocautery to a J-wire is used to perform transseptal puncture (TSP), but with limited evidence supporting safety and efficacy. We conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this technique. Methods: 200 consecutive patients were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to either the ICE-guided electrified J-wire TSP group or a conventional Brockenbrough (BRK) needle TSP group. The TSP was performed with a 0.032″ guidewire under 20W, “coag” mode and was compared to TSP using the BRK needle. The primary safety endpoints were complications related to TSP. The primary efficacy endpoints included the TSP success rate, the total TSP time, and the total procedure time. Results: All patients complete the procedure safely. The electrified J-wire TSP group had a significantly shorter TSP time than BRK needle TSP group. The total procedure time, number of TSP attempts required to achieve successful LA access, width of the intra-atrial shunt at the end of ablation were similar between the two groups. The incidence of new cerebral infarction detected by MRI were similar between the 2 groups (3/32 patients in the J-wire TSP group and 2/26 patients in conventional BRK TSP group, p=0.82). And no difference in the incidence of residual intra-atrial shunt (4.3% versus 6%, p=0.654) during the 3-month’s follow up. Conclusion: Using an electrified J-wire for TSP under the guidance of ICE appears to be as safe as and more efficient than conventional BRK needle TSP, which may be especially useful in the era of non-fluoroscopy AF ablation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jiang et al. (2023) conducted an RCT in Atrial fibrillation (n=200). ICE-guided electrified J-wire trans-septal puncture vs. Conventional Brockenbrough (BRK) needle trans-septal puncture was evaluated on Complications related to TSP (safety); TSP success rate, total TSP time, and total procedure time (efficacy). ICE-guided electrified J-wire trans-septal puncture significantly reduced TSP time compared to conventional BRK needle TSP, with similar rates of residual intra-atrial shunt (4.3% vs 6%, p=0.654).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: