Key result
His-Purkinje conduction system pacing significantly reduced QRS duration compared to biventricular pacing (P<0.0001) and improved NYHA class and 6-minute walking distance at 6 months.
Why the study?
The feasibility and efficacy of His-Purkinje conduction system pacing in CRT candidates with chronic heart failure and permanent atrial fibrillation were not well established.
Does His-Purkinje conduction system pacing improve QRS duration and clinical outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure and permanent atrial fibrillation indicated for CRT?
Observational (n=16)
No
Does His-Purkinje conduction system pacing improve QRS duration and clinical outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure and permanent atrial fibrillation indicated for CRT?
p-value: p=<0.0001
His-Purkinje conduction system pacing is feasible in CRT candidates with chronic heart failure and permanent AF, significantly reducing QRS duration compared to biventricular pacing and improving functional status at 6 months.
May support HPCSP feasibility in CRT for HF with permanent AF; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation before practice change.
Background: The aim is to study the feasibility and efficacy of His-Purkinje conduction system pacing (HPCSP) in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) candidates of chronic heart failure with permanent atrial fibrillation (AF). Subjects and Methods: Patients with chronic heart failure and permanent AF (n = 16) were enrolled from the Department of Cardiology, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, from September 2017 to April 2019 in this observational case study. The patients with chronic heart failure (left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] <40%) and permanent AF with low ventricular rate were indicated for CRT implantation. The study was approved by the Institutional Ethical Committee of Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, China. At baseline, 13 cases had narrow QRS duration (<120 ms) and 3 cases had left bundle branch block with QRS duration >120 ms. HPCSP lead connected to the RA port of the generator was implanted together with conventional biventricular pacing (BVP) and was programmed as HPCSP postprocedure. QRS durations were measured and compared during intrinsic, BVP, and HPCSP. Pacing parameters were measured and compared during postimplantation immediately and 6 months postimplantation. Echocardiogram parameters, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, and 6-min walking distance (6MWD) were collected and compared between baseline and 6 months postimplantation. Results: QRS durations were significantly different during HPCSP compared with BVP (P < 0.0001). Pacing parameters including threshold and R wave amplitude were not significantly different during postimplantation immediately and 6 months postimplantation, whereas impedance was significantly different (P = 0.028). LVEF, left atrial diameter, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, left ventricular end-systolic diameter, mitral regurgitation, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, pulmonary artery systolic pressure, and the percentages of moderate-to-severe mitral regurgitation and tricuspid regurgitation were not significantly different between baseline and 6 months postimplantation, whereas NYHA class and 6MWD were significantly different (P < 0.0001). Conclusion: HPCSP was feasible and effective in CRT candidates of chronic heart failure with permanent AF and low ventricular rate. It could significantly reduce QRS duration as compared to BVP. Moreover, although LVEF was not obviously improved, the pacing parameters were stable and NYHA class and 6MWD were improved during HPCSP at 6-month follow-up.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Su et al. (2019) conducted an observational in chronic heart failure with permanent atrial fibrillation (n=16). His-Purkinje conduction system pacing vs. biventricular pacing was evaluated on QRS duration (p=<0.0001). His-Purkinje conduction system pacing significantly reduced QRS duration compared to biventricular pacing (P<0.0001) and improved NYHA class and 6-minute walking distance at 6 months.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: