Key result
Body surface potential maps outperform vectorcardiograms in estimating infarct size with ~0.88 correlation.
Why the study?
The study aimed to compare the effectiveness of different subtraction approaches using body surface potential maps, vectorcardiograms, and precordial QRS grids to estimate infarct volume in intact dogs.
Does the use of body surface potential maps or vectorcardiograms improve the estimation of anatomic infarct volume compared to precordial QRS grids in dogs?
Does the use of body surface potential maps or vectorcardiograms improve the estimation of anatomic infarct volume compared to precordial QRS grids in dogs?
Body surface potential maps and vectorcardiograms correlate more strongly with anatomic infarct size than precordial QRS grids when preinfarction control data are available.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Body surface map subtraction correlates best with canine infarct size; leaves open human translation without pre-event controls.
Ventricular depolarization was analyzed in intact dogs by simultaneously recording body surface potential maps, McFee axial vectorcardiograms, and a 5 X 4 lead precordial grid of QRS complexes. The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of subtraction approaches, using the simultaneously acquired data. The totally closed chest approach avoided the problem of volume conductor alteration by thoracotomy. Infarct volume was calculated morphologically from measurements of serial ventricular sections. The maximal correlation with anatomic infarct size using the precordial QRS grid approach was 0.51, using cumulative difference data between 1 and 38 msec when the postinfarction grid was substracted from the preinfarction grid. A correlation coefficient of 0.80 was achieved using the numerically integrated data between 1 and 31 msec from the vectorcardiogram, and the body surface potential map achieved a correlation coefficient above 0.88 when the electrical difference of msec 16 was used. These data suggest that estimates of infarct size from selected surface reflections of the activation process are feasible if some sort of preinfarction control data are available. Caution must be exercised to avoid inclusion of electrical effects late in the activation process which contain contamination by highly variable alterations in the excitation sequence due to delayed conduction or alteration in conduction pathway in or near the infarct zone.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Flowers et al. (1978) studied Myocardial infarction. Body surface potential maps vs. Precordial QRS grid and vectorcardiogram was evaluated on Correlation with anatomic infarct size (r > 0.88). Body surface potential maps achieved a correlation coefficient above 0.88 with anatomic infarct size, outperforming vectorcardiograms and precordial QRS grids.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: