Key result
Lower aortic velocity propagation correlates strongly with higher SYNTAX scores in CAD.
Why the study?
Early detection and management of atherosclerosis with accessible, noninvasive methods are valuable for reducing cardiovascular disease mortality, but novel predictive tools are needed.
Does aortic velocity propagation (AVP) predict coronary artery disease burden as effectively as carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) in patients undergoing coronary angiography?
Cross-Sectional (n=150)
Does aortic velocity propagation (AVP) predict coronary artery disease burden as effectively as carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) in patients undergoing coronary angiography?
Effect estimate: r = -0.803
p-value: p=<0.0001
Aortic velocity propagation measured by color M-mode echocardiography is a robust, noninvasive surrogate marker that strongly correlates with coronary artery disease burden and SYNTAX score.
AVP may support noninvasive CAD assessment; leaves open its clinical role pending prospective validation.
The major burden of cardiovascular disease mortality around the globe is due to atherosclerosis and its complications. Hence its early detection and management with easily accessible and noninvasive methods are valuable. Aortic velocity propagation (AVP) through color M-mode of the proximal descending aorta determines aortic stiffness, reflecting atherosclerosis. The aim of this study was to find the utility of AVP in predicting coronary artery disease (CAD) burden assessed through SYNTAX (SYNergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with TAXus and cardiac surgery) score and compared with carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT), which is an established surrogate marker of atherosclerosis. In this cross-sectional comparative study, we measured AVP by color M-mode and CIMT by using Philips QLAB-IMT software in 100 patients, who underwent conventional coronary angiogram (CAG) between May 2013 and November 2014. Coronary artery disease is considered significant if >50% diameter stenosis is present in any epicardial coronary artery and insignificant if otherwise. Initially, to know the normal range we measured AVP and CIMT in 50 patients without any major risk factors for CAD but CAG was not done. Aortic velocity propagation ranged from 46 cm/s to 76 cm/s (mean = 58.62 ± 6.46 cm/s), CIMT ranged from 0.50 mm to 0.64 mm (mean = 0.55 ± 0.03 mm). Among 100 patients who underwent CAG we found 69% had significant CAD, 13% had insignificant CAD, and 18% had normal coronaries. Those with significant CAD had significantly lower AVP (41.65 ± 4.94 cm/s) [F (2,97) = 44.05, p < 0.0001] and significantly higher CIMT (0.86 ± 0.11 mm) [F (2,97) =35.78, p < 0.0001]. AVP had significant strong negative correlation with CIMT (r = −0.836, p < 0.0001, n = 100) and SYNTAX score (r = –0.803, p < 0.0001, n = 69), while CIMT was positively correlated with SYNTAX score significantly (r = 0.828, p < 0.0001, n = 69). AVP and CIMT can predict CAD burden in a robust way. AVP may emerge as an exquisite bedside tool to predict atherosclerotic burden and guide in implementing preventive therapy for cardiovascular disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chetty et al. (2016) conducted a cross-sectional in Coronary artery disease (n=150). Aortic velocity propagation (AVP) vs. Carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) was evaluated on Correlation with SYNTAX score (r = -0.803, p=<0.0001). Aortic velocity propagation strongly correlated with SYNTAX score (r = -0.803, p < 0.0001) and was significantly lower in patients with significant coronary artery disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: