Key result
HBPM correctly classifies hypertension status in ~82% of heart transplant recipients compared with ABPM.
Why the study?
The reliability of home blood pressure monitoring in heart transplant recipients is not known, especially given the frequent nondipper BP profile in this population.
Does home blood pressure monitoring adequately identify hypertension compared to ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in heart transplant recipients?
Observational (n=74)
Does home blood pressure monitoring adequately identify hypertension compared to ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in heart transplant recipients?
Home blood pressure monitoring provides a reliable estimate of blood pressure burden and correlates with organ damage in heart transplant recipients, despite a high prevalence of a nondipper profile.
HBPM may support routine hypertension monitoring in heart transplant recipients; leaves open whether it improves outcomes versus ABPM.
BACKGROUND: How reliable is home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) in heart transplant recipients is not known. Possibly, it may underestimate hypertensive burden, because blood pressure (BP) nondipper profile is frequent among these patients. This prospective study has been designed to determine whether HBPM adequately identifies hypertension in heart transplant recipients. METHOD: We compared HBPM with ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) for the diagnosis of uncontrolled hypertension in 74 patients 13.5±6.7 years after heart transplantation. HBPM was measured with a validated semiautomatic device twice every morning and twice every evening on 7 consecutive days, within 15 days of ABPM. We also measured the relationship between HBPM, ABPM, and organ damage as measured by albuminuria and left ventricular mass. RESULTS: A nondipper profile was found in 53 (72%) patients. HBPM and ABPM were close according to Pearson bivariate correlations. There was no significant correlation between left ventricular mass and BP either at HBPM or ABPM. Proteinuria significantly correlated with systolic BP either at HBPM (R=0.42; P=0.0002) or ABPM (R=0.25; P=0.03). HBPM adequately classified 61 of 74 (82%) patients as hypertensives or as nonhypertensives or controlled hypertensives. CONCLUSION: Despite a high prevalence of nondipper profile, HBPM gives a reliable estimate of BP burden in most heart transplant recipients. Thus, our results strongly suggest that HBPM is useful for the long-term follow-up of heart transplant recipients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ambrosi et al. (2013) conducted an observational in Hypertension in heart transplant recipients (n=74). Home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) vs. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) was evaluated on Adequate classification of hypertension status (hypertensives, nonhypertensives, or controlled hypertensives). Home blood pressure monitoring adequately classified hypertension status in 82% of heart transplant recipients compared to ambulatory monitoring, despite a high prevalence of nondipper profiles.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: