Key result
Higher perirenal fat thickness linked to ~14% greater risk of reduced eGFR per SD.
Why the study?
Is perirenal fat thickness associated with reduced estimated glomerular filtration rate in a hospital-based population?
Cross-Sectional (n=297)
No
Is perirenal fat thickness associated with reduced estimated glomerular filtration rate in a hospital-based population?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Perirenal fat thickness is independently associated with reduced eGFR, a relationship that is partially mediated by serum uric acid and specific lipid parameters.
It is unclear how perirenal fat thickness (PrFT) and impaired renal function are related, particularly in patients with metabolic risk factors. A hospital-based cohort of individuals was examined to determine whether perirenal fat thickness, as measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), is associated with impaired renal function. We also examined and quantified the potential mediating effect of a variety of factors on the association between PrFT and impaired renal function. In total, 297 participants were recruited consecutively from the Department of Endocrinology at a tertiary hospital. MRI was used to measure the thickness of PrFT. An analysis of mediation was performed to determine whether metabolic markers mediated the relationship between PrFT and impaired renal function. There was a significant correlation between elevated PrFT and reduced estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Based on multivariate regression models adjusted for confounders, PrFT showed a significant independent inverse correlation with eGFR, but not with urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR). The results of an exploratory mediation analysis revealed that HDLc, nonHDLc, and uric acid (UA) accounted for part of the association between PrFT and reduced eGFR, with respective percentages explaining 16.1%, 13.6%, and 23.1% of the total association. In this hospital-based cohort, serum UA and specific lipid parameters may contribute to the association between PrFT and reduced eGFR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Reduced estimated glomerular filtration rate (n=297). Perirenal fat thickness vs. Lower perirenal fat thickness was evaluated on Reduced estimated glomerular filtration rate (< 60 mL/min/1.73m2) (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.04-1.25, p=0.001). Higher perirenal fat thickness was significantly associated with an increased risk of reduced estimated glomerular filtration rate (OR 1.14 per standard deviation increase).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: